Amazon could face a new union push and antitrust scrutiny under the Biden administration

Like many in the tech work, Amazon has cozied up to the Democratic Party. Its political action committee and company executives are among those who threw their flush behind President Joe Biden on the campaign trail, while Amazon’s top spokesperson, Jay Carney, has longstanding ties to Biden.

But that doesn’t obligation the next four years of the Biden administration will be smooth sailing for the online retail giant. Antitrust go straight, stronger privacy standards and a renewed push for workers’ rights are just a few of the issues that could be on the new administration’s agenda.

Here’s what’s at investment for Amazon in the Biden administration: 

After a rocky relationship with Trump’s administration, organized labor is confident that Biden will make good on his promises to be “the most pro-union president.” Amazon is likely to keep a solid eye on the new administration’s moves on the labor front, as it faces a renewed push from unions to organize its warehouse workers.

Biden has pull down empowering workers a key tenet of his labor agenda, which also proposes various reforms to labor laws and flesh out worker protections. His plan includes policies that would consider a company’s labor record when bestowing federal contracts and codify into law an Obama-era change to National Labor Relations Board rules aimed at celerity up union election campaigns. 

Biden has also voiced support for the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which passed the Bagnio last February and would levy fines against companies that interfere with workers’ organizing works. While the bill is unlikely to pass in the Senate, it could generate new scrutiny of Amazon’s efforts to track workplace anxiousness, as well as its labor practices.

“I would say [the PRO Act] has very little chance of passing,” said Gordon Lafer, a labor studies professor at the University of Oregon and a inspection associate at the Economic Policy Institute. “So other than that, the question is what could the Biden-appointed Labor Feed do unilaterally without needing legislation? There is a lot they could do that would be significant.”

From a high play fair with, Biden’s support of the labor movement has the potential to reignite union membership after years of steady declines. This could set up a threat to Amazon, which has staunchly opposed unions in its workforce. Amazon’s appetite for unions is currently being proved in Alabama, where workers at its Bessemer warehouse are set to vote next month on whether to join the Retail, Wholesale and Concern Store Union. 

While Biden and Amazon may not see eye to eye on unions, the company is in agreement with Biden on one issue: raising the minutest wage to $15 an hour. In a tweet replying to Biden last week, Amazon touted its $15 minimum wage and remarked it hopes to work with the administration on making it the national standard.

An Amazon spokesperson didn’t respond to questions invite clarity on how it would work with the Biden administration on minimum wage issues. 

Biden has also telegraphed organizes to expand workplace protections by restoring some Obama-era reforms to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which were reeled back by the Trump administration. Biden plans to increase the number of OSHA investigators and require companies to electronically news their workplace injuries, among other changes.

This could mean that Amazon and other comrades face stricter enforcement of OSHA standards. With more investigators on staff, the agency may be more likely to possession up OSHA complaints filed by employees and inspect facilities, as well as levy fines against companies that are build to be in violation of OSHA rules, said Debbie Berkowitz, a former OSHA official who now works for the National Employment Law Draft.

“The enforcement switch at OSHA has been turned off, but it’ll get turned back on,” Berkowitz said. “OSHA will again touched by to complaints with inspections and there will be a willingness to enforce the law to protect workers.”

Amazon’s workplace safety note continues to be a topic of controversy, including during the coronavirus pandemic. California’s attorney general is investigating working conditions at Amazon’s California storerooms during the pandemic, while some lawmakers have scrutinized the company’s response to the coronavirus crisis.

The company has previously answered it continues to invest in creating a safer work environment at its facilities.

Amazon has bolstered its workplace safety team with a party of people who have ties to OSHA and employment litigation as scrutiny of its warehouse working conditions continues to grow. The business added another staffer from the agency to the workplace safety team this month when it brought on Madeleine T. Le, a bygone OSHA lawyer, as senior governance and compliance manager.

“Amazon has lawyered up for this,” Berkowitz said. “They are lawyering up to start scuffle OSHA inspections.”

Amazon spokeswoman Rachael Lighty said the company has expanded its workplace health and safety combine as part of its efforts to ensure its workplaces are “leading in state-of-the-art safety investments, training and education, and safety programs.”

“Today, our international workplace health and safety team is comprised of more than 5,000 employees who use Amazon’s innovation, technology and figures insights, combined with exceptional experience and leadership in the safety industry, to ensure the highest standards to keep our hands safe,” Lighty said.

Biden has offered few hints on how he would approach antitrust issues, beyond designating concern over the power Silicon Valley giants wield in tech and other industries. But there are signs he desire take a tougher stance on reining in Big Tech than the Obama administration, which has been criticized for its close trusses to tech companies. 

While Google and Facebook are currently the focus of investigations on the federal level, Amazon is unlikely to outflow antitrust scrutiny with Biden in the Oval Office. 

Amazon is already being probed by Federal Trade Commission officials all about its business practices in retail and cloud computing, according to reports from several outlets. Last year, the Firm Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust found that Amazon has monopoly power over third-party sellers. Amazon and its rivals, embodying Facebook, Google and Apple, also face a separate probe from the Justice Department.

Groups that are important of Amazon’s power are closely watching who Biden appoints to key posts handling tech policy matters, fearing that any pressurize from Silicon Valley could derail antitrust investigations or diminish scrutiny. Alex Harman, competition action advocate at advocacy group Public Citizen, said he expressed those concerns in meetings with Biden’s medium review teams last November. 

“This was a problem in the Obama administration that I was part of,” Harman said. “There was a flavor of ‘Google is egregious and a Google revolving door is a positive thing.’ That is no longer OK.”

Another tech management that’s likely to be in focus in the new administration is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields tech companies from being responsible for what users post on their platforms. 

Talks of Section 230 reform are often targeted toward communal media companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube. But the law affords Amazon and other e-commerce companies some guards as well. 

Similar to social media companies, the law protects e-commerce sites from being held liable for any user-generated delight on their platforms, like product descriptions or customer reviews. 

Amazon has invoked Section 230 as a defense in some artifact liability lawsuits concerning faulty products sold on its website, arguing that it merely provides the platform for third-party barons to hawk their wares, so it’s not actually the seller. 

The company also pointed to Section 230 in defending its decision to dive Parler, a social media site popular with Trump supporters, from its cloud-computing platform in the wake of the U.S. Capitol turbulence on Jan. 6.

Biden has called for Section 230 to be revoked, arguing that companies should be held accountable for hosting import they know to be false. 

It’s unclear how the Biden administration may seek to reform Section 230. Democrats and Republicans tally there are issues with the law, but they’re divided on why it merits a review. Generally, Democrats hope to hold platforms profuse responsible for policing false speech and calls to violence, while Republicans worry about inconsistent moderation conventions that censor politically conservative viewpoints.

With Democrats in control of Congress, lawmakers could resurrect attempts to regulate facial recognition technology and establish a federal privacy law.

Amazon has previously come under volley from advocacy groups, politicians and employees who have pressured the company to stop selling its facial recognition software to ministry agencies. Last June, Amazon imposed a one-year moratorium on facial recognition software contracts with control, but it didn’t say if the ban applied to federal agencies.

Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris recognized the need for changes to isolation and facial recognition laws before they entered the White House. Biden said in an interview with The New York Organizes last year that the U.S. “should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy.”

Last year, two rooter privacy bills were introduced by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and Ranking Fellow Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. While lawmakers agree on the need for a federal privacy law, they continue to disagree on whether the resident law should preempt state bills and if individuals should be allowed to sue companies over privacy violations.

Lawmakers are already casing the data Amazon collects from consumers. Last month, the Federal Trade Commission sent letters to Amazon, Facebook, Tweet and several other tech companies requiring them to hand over information about how they collect and use matter.

In 2019, Amazon and other members of the Business Roundtable wrote to congressional leaders saying the support the creation of a consumer text privacy law.

When it comes to facial recognition, as a U.S. Senator for California, Harris expressed skepticism around facial admission technology. Harris in 2018 wrote to three federal agencies to highlight research showing how facial recognition can produce or fortify racial and gender bias.

Amazon would be impacted by any federal limits on facial recognition technology, such as those tendered in the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act, a bill that seeks to ban federal law enforcement use of the technology.

Groups that patron for racial justice and privacy rights are hoping the Biden administration will take up the call to keep the technology out of the presents of law enforcement permanently.