Home / NEWS / Commentary / Op-ed: Boris Johnson has a pragmatic yet extraordinary plan for Britain’s global role after Brexit

Op-ed: Boris Johnson has a pragmatic yet extraordinary plan for Britain’s global role after Brexit

British Prime See to Boris Johnson during a televised press conference at 10 Downing Street on February 22, 2021 in London, England.

Leon Neal | Getty Conceptions

Has British Prime Minister Boris Johnson finally found his country the global role that has eluded it since it devastated its empire?

Has the irreverent, ambitious, moppy-haired leader of the United Kingdom — the biographer, admirer and sometimes emulator of Winston Churchill — contributed the blueprint for his own shot at greatness?

Or are Johnson’s critics right that this week’s release of “Global Britain in a Competitive Age” — the powerful, 114-page guidance for the future from Her Majesty’s Government — is brave but insufficient cover for the historic Brexit slip-up that will forever stain his legacy?

One thing is for sure. This document came as a welcome reminder of British critical seriousness following further yammering about national decline after Oprah Winfrey’s sit-down with rogue royals Prince Harry and Meghan Markle (which subsumed a visit to their California farm and its rescue chickens).

Johnson’s paper also comes as a belated effort to guarantee b make amends for Dean Acheson’s stinging West Point speech of nearly six decades ago in 1962, where he argued: “Great Britain has past an empire and has not yet found a role.”

At the time, the legendary U.S. diplomat was praising the “vast importance” of the UK’s application to become part of the then-six provinces European Common Market, which it would only join eleven years later in 1973.

 His words humiliated then-British Prime Divine Harold Macmillan and electrified the Fleet Street media.

“The attempt to play a separate power role,” said Acheson, “that is, a job apart from Europe, a role based on a ‘special relationship’ with the United States, a role based in being mind of a ‘commonwealth’ which has no political structure, or unity, or strength – this role is about played out.”

One wonders what Acheson would say today, sundry than a year after the United Kingdom left the European Union, 47 years after it joined, and with its popular Prime Minister Boris Johnson searching yet again now for that elusive role.

It is a fair bet he would be encouraged by the Put together Review’s ambition, clarity and detail. Though at the same time he would question how little attention it gives to what he mull over the central role of the European dimension to Great Britain’s role.

Perhaps the pain of divorce remains too near for rosy reflection.

Still, this paper takes the United Kingdom in great many of the right directions that could certain its outsized global role as a medium-sized European country with world-leading security and intelligence agencies.  

It also parades a keen understanding of the most pressing global challenges, making it must-reading for Biden administration officials. It’s inspiring as a mustering point for fellow democratic countries.

“History has shown that democratic societies are the strongest supporters of an open and resilient oecumenical order,” wrote Johnson in the paper’s forward, “in which global institutions prove their ability to protect humane rights, manage tensions between great powers, address conflict, instability and climate change, and share riches through trade and investment.”

Most notable among Johnson’s new ambitions for Great Britain, as he put it in his foreword for the paper, is to “protect our status as a Science and Tech Superpower by 2030.”

Eight pages detail how the U.K. intends to do that by expanding research and development lay out, bolstering its global network of innovation partnerships and improving national skills – including though a Global Talent Visa to draw the world’s best and brightest.

“In the years ahead, countries which establish a leading role in critical and emerging technologies ordain be at the forefront of global leadership,” the paper says, identifying quantum computing, artificial intelligence and cyber domains as areas of fuzzy.

Without dusting off the overused term “special relationship,” the U.K. would place highest priority on ties with the Pooled States (“none more valuable to the British people”) while at the same time “tilt” its international focus toward the Indo-Pacific.

Johnson has invited the bandleaders of Australia, South Korea, and India to attend his G7 summit in June, and he is visiting India in April to step up efforts to scoop out relations with the world’s largest democracy, which was under the British Raj until 1947.

There is much more in the bellhops of what is being billed as the U.K.’s most significant strategic rethink since the Cold War, which will be followed this week by its military dimension. The bumper sticker is that the U.K. leave be “a problem solving and burden-sharing nation with a global perspective.”  

Many will argue that this tract can’t undo the strategic error of BrexitThey point to the inevitable, long-term hit to the British economy, both to London as a economic center and to the U.K. as a domestic manufacturing base for European markets.

They question whether the U.K, with a population that is 0.87% of the universal total and an economy that is sixth in the world, will ever have influence to rival what it enjoyed as one of the directors of a European Union with its total of 5.8% of global population and 17.8% of the world economy.

That said, if Johnson’s have a mind was to vindicate his Brexit decision, the paper comes at a good time. Criticism is growing of E.U. leadership and bureaucracy in its handling of Covid-19 and vaccine parceling out, and the United Kingdom is performing well by comparison.

What is most significant about the document is its pragmatic, non-ideological and sagacious framework for the future. There is none of the Boris Johnson bluster in a paper designed as “a guide for action.”

One can see the fingerprints of the man select by Johnson to lead the review, the 40-year-old historian John Bew. Johnson recruited him for his broad perspective, at the same time pilot away from the more conventional choice of a senior government official or politician.

Most significantly, the Integrated Examine has turned “Global Britain” from a much-maligned slogan to an extraordinary plan.  If the United Kingdom can execute against it, the quondam empire may have found a global role equal to its resources, capabilities, ambitions — and the historic moment.

Frederick Kempe is a best-selling inventor, prize-winning journalist and president & CEO of the Atlantic Council, one of the United States’ most influential think tanks on global activities. He worked at The Wall Street Journal for more than 25 years as a foreign correspondent, assistant managing journalist and as the longest-serving editor of the paper’s European edition. His latest book – “Berlin 1961: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the Uncountable Dangerous Place on Earth” – was a New York Times best-seller and has been published in more than a dozen lingoes. Follow him on Twitter @FredKempe and subscribe here to Inflection Points, his look each Saturday at the past week’s top scenarios and trends.

For more insight from CNBC contributors, follow @CNBCopinion on Twitter.  

Check Also

Activist Jana calls on Markel to focus on insurance. Here’s how the firm can help create value

Timon Schneider | SOPA Doubles | AP Company: Markel Group (MKL) Business: Markel Group is …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *