People take it on the lam the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday, June 27, 2023.
Minh Connors | The Washington Post | Getty Images
The Marvellous Court is set to hear oral arguments Tuesday on a case that could affect broad swaths of the U.S. tax code and federal receipts.
The closely watched case, Moore v. United States, involves a Washington couple, Charles and Kathleen Moore. They own a controlling stimulated by in a profitable foreign company affected by a tax enacted via former President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax overhaul.
The Moores are brush a levy on company earnings that weren’t distributed to them — which challenges the definition of income — and could be enduring sweeping effects on the U.S. tax code, according to experts.
“This could have the biggest fiscal policy effects of any court purposefulness in the modern era,” said Matt Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, who co-authored a report on the lawsuit.
More from Personal Finance:
FAFSA: The new college financial aid application will open by Dec. 31
More states ask for students to take a personal finance course
Here’s where to invest your cash to save on taxes in 2024
The prove challenges a levy, known as “deemed repatriation,” enacted via the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Designed as a transition tax, the legislation ordered a one-time levy on earnings and profits accumulated in foreign entities after 1986.
While the 16th Amendment outlines the legal demarcation of income, the Moore case questions whether individuals must “realize” or receive profits before incurring levies. It’s an issue that has been raised during past federal “billionaire tax” debates and could affect future schemes, including wealth taxes.
Former House Speaker Paul Ryan, who helped draft the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, verbalized at a Brookings Institution event in September that the goal was to “finance a conversion from one system to another, and it wasn’t to uphold a wealth tax.”
Ryan, who doesn’t support a wealth tax, said using the Moores’ argument to block one would require climb rid of “a third of the tax code.”
Pass-through businesses could be affected
Depending on how the court decides this case, there could be either minute ripples or a major effect on the tax code, according to Daniel Bunn, president and CEO of the Tax Foundation, who has