Home / NEWS LINE / The Risks of Mortgage-Backed Securities

The Risks of Mortgage-Backed Securities

A mortgage-backed sanctuary (MBS) is a type of asset-backed security that is secured by a mortgage or collection of mortgages. An MBS can be traded through a broker. It is issued by either a government-sponsored gumption (GSE), an authorized federal government agency or private financial company. 

Features of MBS

While they are attractive for a number of reasons, MBS be experiencing some unique features which add additional risk when compared to plain vanilla bonds. 

  • MBS are collateralized by a lake of residential mortgages.
  • Monthly payments “pass through” the originating bank on to a third-party investor.
  • Besides monthly stimulated by payments, mortgages amortize over their life, meaning some amount of principal is paid off with every monthly payment, uncharacteristic a bond, which generally pays all principal at maturity.
  • In addition to scheduled amortizations, investors receive, on a pro-rata principle, unscheduled prepayments of principal due to refinancing, foreclosure and house sales. While a typical mortgage may have a term of 30 years, really often mortgages are paid off much sooner. Due to these unscheduled prepayments, predicting the maturity of the MBS is problematic.

With a blurry on the prepayment aspect of MBS, this article will introduce the concept of weighted average life (WAL), and explain its use in guarding against prepayment chance.

What Is Weighted Average Life?

A statistic that is commonly used as a measure of the effective maturity of a MBS is the WAL, sometimes noticed just “average life.” To calculate the WAL, multiply the date (expressed as a fraction of years or months) of each payment by the piece of total principal that is paid off at that date, then add up these results. Thus, the WAL registers the impact of important paydowns over the lifetime of the security.

The WAL can be visualized as a fulcrum on a timeline that runs from origination to the final maturation date. The fulcrum “balances” the principal payments, just like children of different weights balance a seesaw by organizing different positions on the bar. Figure 1 below depicts the WAL for a 30-year mortgage pool. 

Source: “The Duration of a Bond as a Price Adjustability and a Fulcrum” (1988) by Dr. David Smith.

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2021


Yields and the Internal Rate of Return

MBS are marketable and can truck at premiums, discounts or par value, depending upon changes in current market rates. A current-coupon pass-through trades at par value, while high-coupon pass-throughs commerce at premiums and low-coupon securities trade at discounts. The quoted yield is the internal rate of return, which equates the adjacent value of all future cash flows with the current price of the security. Therefore, the quoted yield on an MBS is always conditional on a prepayment assumption.

The prepayment assumption is vital to mortgage pass-through securities. Investors know in advance that prepayment can and will occur, but do not know when and by how much. Those variables obligated to be projected and assumed. Also, there is not a single, conservative assumption that can apply to all pass-throughs because of the asymmetric impact—there is an incentive to prepay more quickly on premium MBS, while the reverse is true for discount MBS.

What Is the Realized Give up?

The realized yield on a pass-through security is the yield that the purchaser actually receives while holding the security, based on the genuine prepayments of principal, rather than on the assumed prepayments that were used to calculate the quoted yield. Prepayments that are faster or slower than needed affect premium and discount pass-throughs asymmetrically.

Suppose that the pass-through security is trading at a premium. Prepayments at par value issue in cash flows that can only be reinvested at the lower, current rate. Consequently, faster-than-assumed prepayments deny the investor the sharp cash flows that justified the premium price in the first place. On the other hand, slower prepayments forth the investor more time to earn the higher coupon rate. As a result, slower prepayments raise the realized income above the quoted yield, while faster prepayments lower the realized yield.

A discount pass-through benefits from faster-than-anticipated prepayments because those exchange flows can be reinvested at par value in current-coupon securities. In effect, the investor can simply replace the low coupon for a higher one, since the prepayment is at par. As a result, the realized yield will exceed the quoted yield. On the contrary, the reverse happens when prepayments are slower than count oned. The investor is stuck with the lower coupons for a longer period of time, thereby reducing realized yield.

What Is the Prepayment Assumption?

Over the years, a include of conventional specifications of assumed prepayment rates have been developed. Each has its advantages and disadvantages.

Standard Mortgage Gain

The first and simplest specification is to assume the “standard mortgage yield” or “prepaid in 12.” In this specification, it is assumed that there are no prepayments whatsoever until the twelfth year, when all the mortgages in the amalgamate prepay in entirety.

This specification has the advantage of computational simplicity and conforms to the reality that the effective maturity of most mortgage syndicates is far shorter than the final maturity date. Beyond that, not much can be said for this assumption. It totally cold-shoulders the prepayments that occur in the early years of a mortgage pool. Therefore, a yield calculated and quoted on the basis of this “defined” prepayment assumption seriously understates the potential yield on a pass-through security trading at a deep discount and overstates the implied yield on a premium pass-through.

FHA Experience Method

At the other end of the spectrum is a prepayment specification based on actual experiences of the Federal Quarters Administration (FHA). The FHA compiles historical data on the actual incidence of prepayment on the mortgage loans that it insures. This materials covers a wide range of origination dates and coupon rates.

The FHA experience method was clearly an improvement over the orthodox mortgage yield, since it introduced realistic and historically validated assumptions, yet it is not without its own problems. Since the FHA publishes a new series not quite every year, the secondary mortgage market faced the confusing circumstance of having securities based on series from dissimilar years.

Constant Prepayment Rate

Another specification that has been used is the constant prepayment rate (CPR), also known as the “conditional prepayment evaluation in any case.” This specification assumes that the percentage of the principal balance that is prepaid during a given year is a unceasing.

The CPR method is easier to work with analytically than FHA experience, because the applicable prepayment rate for each year is one consonant number, not one of 30 varying numbers. Consequently, it is easier to compare quoted yields for a certain holding period across contrasting prepayment assumptions. One subtle advantage to the CPR method is that it exposes the subjective nature of the prepayment assumption. The FHA experience nearly equal implies a degree of precision that might be totally unwarranted.

A variant of the CPR is called “single-monthly mortality” (SMM). The SMM is simply the monthly analogue to the annual CPR. It counterfeits that the percentage of the principal balance that is prepaid during a given month is a constant.

PSA Standard Prepayment Perfect

The most commonly used prepayment rate assumption is the standard prepayment experience offered by the Public Securities Conjunction (PSA), an industry trade group. The PSA’s goal was to bring standardization to the marketplace. The first 30 months of standard prepayment knowledge call for a steadily rising CPR, starting at zero and rising 0.2% each month; thereafter, a level six percent CPR is Euphemistic pre-owned. Sometimes, however, yields are based on a faster or slower prepayment assumption than this standard. This modulate in prepayment assumption is indicated by designating a percentage above or below 100%.

  • An MBS quoted at 200% PSA assumes a 0.4% CPR monthly climb over the first 30 months, then a level CPR at 12%.
  • An MBS quoted at 50% PSA assumes a 0.1% monthly increase in the CPR, until the three percent CPR constant is attained.

The Bottom Line

As discussed, using weighted average life involves a number of assumptions and is far from accurate. However, it helps investors make more realistic predictions on the yield and term of an MBS which helps reduce the basic prepayment risk.

Check Also

S&P 500 Gains and Losses Today: Supermicro Soars on Expectations of AI-Driven Growth

Bloomberg / Contributor / Getty Notions Key Takeaways The S&P 500 eked out a gain …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *