Home / NEWS LINE / Dummy Director Definition

Dummy Director Definition

What Is a Mannikin Director?

A dummy director is a member of the board of directors who acts and votes on behalf of a non-board member. Although they are reasoned a director, a dummy director is only a figurehead. They exercise no real control over the company, and they have planned no financial interest in it. Dummy directors are also known as an accommodation director or nominal director.

Understanding Dummy Big cheeses

Dummy directors are most commonly used by start-up companies that are going public. To meet regulatory necessities, they establish a board of directors by electing a number of nominee directors to serve temporarily, and act on behalf of management, until unalterable directors can be found.

As stand-in members of a board, dummy directors would experience a conflict of interest if they sat on the trustees for any length of time. This is because all board members have legal fiduciary duties to the corporation that they are depicting. Board members are expected to act in good faith, with candor and confidentiality, and in the best interest of the corporation.

Key Takeaways

  • A idiot director is a member of the board of directors who acts and votes on behalf of a board member.
  • Dummy directors are commonly acclimated to by start-up companies that use nominee directors to serve temporarily, and act on behalf of management, until permanent directors are start.
  • Dummy directors are figureheads and exercise no real control over a company.

Example of a Dummy Directors

In a 2013 victim involving Puda Coal, a Chinese company charged with fraud and forging important documentation, a judge decided that directors appointed by the Delaware-based company were culpable in the fraud. “Independent directors who step into these locales involving essentially the fiduciary oversight of assets in other parts of the world have a duty not to be dummy directors,” the court turned. In another case in Australia, a baker was made director of two companies—a horse-training business and an Indian restaurant—to pony up the outlays of hiring solicitors for help with his business. The solicitor’s business was later found to have evaded taxes to the be alert to of $100 million.

Check Also

The Two Biggest Flash Crashes of 2015

The period of time “flash crash” gained popularity in 2010 when on May 6, the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *