Home / INVESTING / Personal Finance / Here’s how to maximize charitable donations before tax reform

Here’s how to maximize charitable donations before tax reform

The embryonic for Congress to pass a tax-cuts bill is shaping up to be good news for beneficent organizations this year.

As Republican lawmakers work toward deciding legislation to overhaul the U.S. tax code, taxpayers are eyeing ways to maximize their move for 2017 before changes included in the tax bill could make it harder to get the biggest bang for their buck.

“We’re clothing a lot of advisors and clients talk to us about bringing their giving well-advanced, giving … enough money [this year] so they can maximize their tax decrease and fund multiple years of giving in the future,” Kim Laughton, president of Schwab Liberal, told CNBC.

As it stands, both the Senate and House versions — whose contrasts lawmakers are working on reconciling — include provisions that could modify charitable-giving tax strategies.

For starters, while the deduction for charitable contributions is one of the few fostered in the tax bill, fewer taxpayers would likely use it. That’s because the mean deduction also would nearly double, meaning fewer households disposition itemize — which is the only way to take advantage of the deduction for charitable contributions.

One way to put in order for that would be to combine two years’ worth of gifts into one.

“We’re succeeding to see more ‘bunching’ of deductions,” said Kim Garcia, a principal with Spread Trust in Greensboro, North Carolina. “Instead of making gifts in two isolated years, we might start seeing people doing it every other year to fool a higher amount contributed in one year to get them over the [standard abstraction] threshold.”

While charitable contributions are generally limited to 50 percent of zipped gross income, you can carry over to next year — and up to five years — any amount that exceeds the limit.

Another introduced change in the Senate tax legislation (but not in the House version) would affect the garage sale of stock, which might make it more beneficial to gift dispensations this year.

Under current law, investors with taxable brokerage accounts fool several choices when putting in a sell order for stock share outs: They can direct their broker to sell the oldest shares beginning (the first-in-first-out, or FIFO, method) or direct the sale of shares that were bought on a particular date (specific identification method). Those same elections apply when identifying shares to gift.

The Senate bill’s prerequisite eliminates the specific identification method. Stock investors would be made to divest their oldest shares first regardless of whether those slices come with the lowest cost basis.

“The reason for gifting low-basis hackneyed is to avoid the capital gains on that asset,” Garcia said. “So if you arrange tax lots out there with a low basis, it’s better to gift it to charity now while you can specifically mark them.”

When gifting stock, you get to write off the value of the donation, along with honour no tax on the gains. (If congressional efforts to change tax law fail, no harm will be done because you can up till carry over any amount you can’t write off this year.)

The charity also advances when you gift stock.

“Appreciated assets make particularly beneficial charitable gifts, because when you give [them] to a charity … the humanitarianism doesn’t have to pay capital gains tax on the sale of those assets,” Schwab Eleemosynary’s Laughton said.

Keep in mind that if you choose to use a donor-advised subsidize to manage your charitable giving, the same carry-over rules go after.

A donor-advised fund is an account dedicated to holding charitable dollars until they are apportioned. You can give either cash or appreciated investments to the fund and take a tax finding for that contribution in the year you make the gift. You then can use the fund’s assets to reveal d become exhausted to charities of your choice over time.

Beyond those blueprints, here are some tips to keep in mind while deciding where to pilot your donations:

For your generosity to count against your excises, donations must go to tax-exempt organizations. These include 501(c)(3) nonprofits, churches and other conscientious organization, among others. You cannot deduct contributions made to ones or political organizations or candidates.

To use your charitable contributions against your dues, you must itemize your deductions. This means that, for it to turn up tell of financial sense, the combined value of all your deductions would need to overshadow the standard deductions for 2017: $12,700 for married couples, $9,350 for heads of households and $6,350 for lone filers and married couples filing separately.

Generally speaking, your tot up charitable contributions are deductible up to 50 percent of your adjusted earthy income. For high earners — i.e., those with 2017 adjusted intake income of $261,500 or more, for single filers, and $313,800 for married yokes filing jointly — so-called Pease limitations could cap the value of your subtractions further.

Regardless of the amount, you must be able to substantiate both bills and non-cash donations. For contributions worth $250 or more, you need erased acknowledgement of the gift from the recipient organization. Donations of non-cash notices worth $5,000 or more require a professional appraisal. While you do not send in these records with your tax return, you must be able to display them if you are audited.

Unless you’re carrying over an outsized charitable present (see rules above), you can only take a deduction for a charitable donation for the year in which you chose it. This means that if you want to use certain contributions against your 2017 tolls, you generally have until Dec. 31 to get it done. For gifts of stock or other assets rabbited at a brokerage, the date the trade is executed is typically the official date of the flair.

More from CNBC Personal Finance:

Cost of GOP tax bill could broken entitlement programs

Find out what the Senate’s tax bill means for you

‘Vacation blameworthiness’ costs workers $66.4 billion in lost benefits

Check Also

Here’s where young adults are most likely to live with parents — the top 3 cities are in California

Catherine Drop b fails Commercial | Moment | Getty Images In some California cities, it’s …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *