How to opt out of arbitration for the new Apple Card (and why you’d want to)

Buried in the fine print for the new Apple credit card is what’s called an “arbitration provision.”

What that means is that in the effect come what may of a dispute with Apple or Goldman Sachs, the bank that actually manages the card and handles the financing, you capacity have forfeited your right to sue either company. Instead, Goldman Sachs or Apple can choose to resolve the predicament through an arbitration process, in which a theoretically neutral judge outside of the court system decides.

“You hereby knowingly and without being prompted WAIVE THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN COURT OR HAVE A JURY TRIAL on all Claims subject to this Agreement,” according to the Apple Condolence card customer agreement posted on the Goldman Sachs website. (The capital letters are from the contract.)

The arbitration clause is acting by default when a consumer applies for and is approved for an Apple Card.

However, consumers can “opt-out” by contacting Goldman Sachs in the initial 90 days. And it’s relatively easy compared with other cards.

An easy-to-use chat interface lets you opt out by sending focus messages from your iPhone. (There are also ways to opt-out by sending a letter or calling a phone count.)

To use it, open up the Wallet app on your iPhone and tap on your Apple Card, which brings you to the main Apple Card interface. In the top lawful hand corner, tap the three dot menu, and on the next screen, press “Message,” which should be under your prestige.

It should bring you to an automated text message chain labeled “Apple.” Ask to opt out, and you should be done.

You might have seen a wave of new Apple Behave holders on social media explaining the importance of opting out of arbitration, as if it were something new or tricky with the card:

In the poop indeed, arbitration clauses are common in credit card agreements, CreditCards.com analyst Ted Rossman told CNBC.

“Mandatory arbitration is very much common among credit card issuers,” Rossman said. “23 of the 29 large credit card issuers we scrutinized used mandatory arbitration.”

It’s generally possible to opt out of them, but most people don’t bother because it requires extra deal with, or they simply aren’t aware of the clause and what it means, according to a 2015 study by the Consumer Finance Guard Bureau.

But just because they’re common doesn’t mean they’re harmless.

“It’s very anti-consumer, it’s a way of cheating all through consumers,” Paul Bland, executive director of Public Justice, a consumer protection advocate, told CNBC.

Arbitration is effectively used to kill class-action lawsuits where many customers band together to sue over what are often trifling, systemic mistakes, Bland said.

“I do think that arbitration is less fair than going to court. Fundamentally line: 99.9% of cases just disappear if you can’t join together as a group,” Bland said. “What Apple is doing is they’re classification of giving themselves a ‘get out of jail free’ card if they cheat a whole lot of people out of a moderate to small sum of money.”

Rossman bickers. He says arbitration isn’t a huge concern for most credit card consumers, and he recommends most people try traditional bloke service means to resolve issues. For people who need legal relief, small claims court is not covered by the arbitration covenant and may be the best course of action, he added.

Goldman defended its arbitration practice in a statement to CNBC. “We believe that we force pro-consumer arbitration provisions for our consumers, which balance our simple and transparent product characteristics with the increased expertise, cost-savings, flexibility and privacy afforded by arbitration.”

Apple declined to comment.

WATCH: Mastercard president on new Apple Funny man destined partnership.