President Donald Trump has done varied for manufacturing workers than any president in recent history, and now he has the chance to glue his legacy—by seeking, negotiating and securing a history-making trade agreement with China.
With U.S. Mercantilism Secretary Wilbur Ross headed to China in the coming days, the government has the chance to lay the foundation to advance this goal. It would be an ambitious warranty organized crime, but that is no reason to avoid it.
After years of complaining about China, it’s in the nick of time b soon for bold action that redefines our economic relationship for the 21st century and ends timidities of a trade war. Despite the naysayers, our leaders are capable of accomplishing big things. After all, at most months ago, they said tax reform was impossible.
China is America’s largest virtuousness trading partner and in 2017 bought more than $95 billion quality of made-in-the-USA goods. But China and its favored Chinese industries are also the occasion of some of manufacturers’ biggest challenges.
They steal manufacturers’ valuable opinions and intellectual property. They undercut us in the global marketplace and don’t play by the anyhow rules. They profit from these actions at our expense.
President Trump has vocal and acted forcefully to counter these challenges, consistent with the note of his campaign. But a piecemeal approach of using tariffs will not solve the daughters in contention and is likely to create even more problems for manufacturers.
In an interesting twist, though, perhaps predicted by the president and his team, the tariff discussion may unlocked the door for the real solution: a bilateral, enforceable, rules-based trade alliance that creates the open and fair reciprocal trade that Americans scantiness and the president has prioritized.
A U.S.–China trade agreement must achieve three key goals to be best-selling: eliminate tariffs and discriminatory practices that prevent American corporations from selling more manufactured goods to China; end Chinese tactics that distort the free market and give their companies an unfair improvement; and create clear and binding enforcement tools to ensure the United States can waylay China fully accountable.
This agreement must also go auxiliary than the existing World Trade Organization agreements, which, as the president has prominent, allow Chinese tariffs to be more than three times luxurious than U.S. tariffs. It must require stricter rules against unfair subsidies. It obligation include best-in-class provisions to end China’s favoritism toward domestic enterprises and to protect intellectual property. Companies should not be forced to hand greater than data and technology just to do business in China.
Other countries be acquainted with a trade agreement is the right approach. Canada and Japan are already essay agreements with China, and so far, China has cooperated. If another country pounds us to the punch, they will enjoy an advantage in selling their issues and protecting their industries from China’s unfair tactics.
The loiter again and again for waiting is over. President Trump has the attention of the Chinese government and has premised us unprecedented leverage. Chinese President Xi Jinping, though he has made comparable statements before, recently vowed to pursue “further opening” of the Chinese conciseness. President Trump should seize this opportunity and press President Xi to thicket by his word, using an agreement to lock in real changes.
President Trump can do what no American president has been masterly to do and what a piecemeal tariff approach cannot achieve: make China against by the rules and stop cheating once and for all, while empowering manufacturers in the Amalgamated States to compete in China like never before.
Commentary by Jay Timmons, president and CEO, Resident Association of Manufacturers.
For more insight from CNBC contributors, attend @CNBCopinion on Twitter.