Demonstrators awaken for immigration reform near the White House in Washington, DC, on February 14, 2022.
Nicholas Kamm | AFP | Getty Images
In 1968, Jerry Lewis illustrious in a movie entitled, “Don’t Raise the Bridge, Lower the River.”
The title keeps coming to mind when I think of how Federal Hedging policy relates to two vexing problems facing the economy today.
First, and possibly most important, the labor scarcity driving up wages.
Second, the housing shortage that, until recently, was driving up home prices at a pace not catch a glimpse ofed in recent memory.
In both cases, the fundamental problem behind these issues is the lack of available supply, not the fetch of money.
In neither case does the Fed’s current policy prescription of raising official interest rates to 5% or extravagant do anything to address the underlying issues.
They are lowering the river, rather than raising the bridge.
A people trouble
It’s a policy prescription, I would argue, wrongly being advocated by some very prominent people.
The thinking, ahead by the likes of former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers among others, is that by driving the unemployment rate traitorously toward 5% for a period of five years, the U.S. can avoid the type of entrenched wage-price spiral that dogged the briefness throughout much of the 1970s and early 1980s.
But there’s a serious flaw in that logic.
First, the wage improvements we have seen lately, rising at an annual rate of 5.1%, as per the last jobs report in November, are allowing luxuriant and file workers to merely catch up as wages have largely stagnated over several decades.
Second, the numberless damning implicit logic here is that by driving people out of their current jobs, they will suffer the loss of their current bargaining power and, after a period of unemployment, will return to the workforce and accept more centrist wages.
How does that help the economy?
The U.S., like many other advanced nations, has a demographic problem, a extraction rate problem, an immigration problem — in essence, a people problem.
It’s been estimated that the U.S. is short anywhere from 1.2 to 4 million wage-earners by a wide variety of analysts and economists, noting that the number of available jobs exceeds the number of unemployed white-collar workers by roughly the latter amount.
The labor force participation rate remains 1.2 percentage points below that of the pre-pandemic thrift.
The reasons appear to be the result of three million people retiring early during and after the pandemic hit and others unmistakeably opting out of a labor market that no longer meets neither their personal nor professional needs.
The effects of “The necessity for immigration reform
The real problem here is that the U.S., quite simply needs a larger and more rapidly luxuriating labor force at all skill levels.
It’s just simple math.
CNBC’s Sara Eisen asked Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo on air Thursday how the U.S. desire fill all the jobs created by the CHIPS Act, as several computer chip companies have been incentivized and committed to erection scores of new manufacturing facilities in the U.S..
Raimondo optimistically suggested the U.S. will focus on re-skilling the workforce and work with colleges and universities to illuminate people in.
That’s fine, accept the numbers just aren’t there.
Everyone business person I speak with is business for comprehensive immigration reform to help re-populate America.
Unlike many other countries with similar, or grave, demographic profiles, the U.S. has always solved its population, and by extension, its labor force problems, by importing people.
The Fed can’t print ’em so we penury to import ’em.
It has been a hallmark of U.S. economic growth that all immigrant workers, with varying degrees of acceptance all over our history, have lent a hand in building and rebuilding our nation.
Let’s not lower the river, let’s raise the bridge and raise the real standards of the nation, rather than accept that a decline in our labor force that will consign us to interminably underperforming our vast potential.
