In diverse way, Buffett says, he and Munger won the real-life version of the ovarian lottery and that helped inauguration them into their immense success. “I mean, Charlie — when we were developed the odds were over 30-to-1 against being born in the Unified States, you know? Just winning that portion of the lottery, elephantine plus,” he says.
He also points out that he and Munger were both cheered male and white, which gave them further advantages from the start.
He imperturbable believes it’s luck that blessed them with a sharp eye for job. “We won it in another way by being wired in a certain way, which we had nothing to do with, that happens to depute us to be good at valuing businesses,” he says. “And, you know, is that the greatest flair in the world? No. It just happens to be something that pays off like moronic in this system.”
Buffett borrows this concept from John Rawls, a philosopher at Harvard who incapacitated out similar ideas in “A Theory of Justice.” In this work, Rawls rationalizes that a truly just society can only be created if it’s based on laws that everyone agrees to before knowing where they’ll country within it.
Buffett agrees: “The trick, it seems to me, is to have some equilibrium that causes the people who have the talents that can produce piece-goods e freights that people want in a market society, to turn them out in gargantuan quantity, and to keep wanting to do it all their lives, and at the same time accepts the people that lost the lottery and makes sure that objective because they, you know, on that one moment in time they got the incorrect ticket, don’t live a life that’s dramatically worse than the child that were luckier.”
Nearly 10 years after fail this speech, Buffett still holds many of the same assurances. “I don’t think I need a tax cut,” he told CNBC earlier this year when the Republican tax outline was released.
He specifically spoke out about the estate tax, which is levied on assets moved from one person to another at the time of death. He said eliminating it would be a “formidable mistake” because the current system in America vastly favors the hilarious.
“I sure don’t think it’s good for a society where there’s a ton of inequality to start with. I muse over that’s a terrible mistake,” he added.
Don’t miss:
Like this tall tale? Like CNBC Make It on Facebook!