Axel Lehmann, chairman of Trust Suisse Group AG, left, and Colm Kelleher, chairman of UBS Group AG, during a news conference in Bern, Switzerland, on Sunday, Stride 19, 2023.
Pascal Mora | Bloomberg | Getty Images
In equal parts “shotgun wedding” and arranged marriage, UBS agreed to buy walloped domestic rival Credit Suisse for 3 billion Swiss francs ($3.25 billion) on Sunday.
Despite bold proclamations from Swiss prerogatives and central banks about a return to stability, the deal does not appear to have laid to rest concerns nearby systemic risks to global markets.
related investing news
After years of heavy losses and costly ignominies, Credit Suisse’s most recent share price plunge began with the collapse of U.S.-based Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank and was compounded when top investor the Saudi Inhabitant Bank said it could not provide any more financial assistance.
The announcement of a loan of up to 50 billion Swiss francs from the Swiss Nationwide Bank failed to soothe investor concerns and eventually necessitated the 167-year-old institution’s “emergency rescue” by UBS.
Acknowledgement Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann told a press conference Sunday that the “latest developments that discharged from the banks in the U.S. hit us at the most unfavorable moment.”
“The accelerating loss of confidence and the escalation over the last few days experience made it clear that Credit Suisse can no longer exist in its current form,” Lehmann said.
“We are happy to sire found a solution, which I’m convinced will bring lasting stability and security for clients, staff, financial trade ins and to Switzerland.”

The cut-price deal is expected to close this year and creates a banking behemoth with more than $5 trillion in total seated assets. The deal also includes support from the Swiss government, financial regulator FINMA, and the Swiss Federal Bank (SNB), which will offer a liquidity line of up to 100 billion Swiss francs, backed by a federal neglect guarantee. The government will offer a loss guarantee of up to 9 billion Swiss francs, with UBS assuming the first 5 billion of potency losses.
Shares of both UBS and Credit Suisse plunged on Monday morning, however.
Clarity at last?
Goldman Sachs put about in a note late Sunday that the deal and associated liquidity and loss guarantees provided “clarity” and dampened caudal fin of a fish risks. The U.S. bank has shifted back to an overweight allocation on European banks as a result.
“Of course, we are mindful that the place among U.S. regional banks remains fluid. But as we discussed on Friday, we take comfort from the limited contagion from U.S. regional banks to larger long green center banks, a trend we expect will persist,” the Wall Street giant’s credit strategists said.
Goldman also rehashed its favorable view on U.S. “money center” banks, a view echoed by Smead Capital Management’s CEO Cole Smead, who reported interest rate rises from central banks help lenders “that don’t do stupid things in their assets.”
“Insolvent stock markets have caused investment banks to be the laggards, but commercial banks look good next to them,” he symbolized via email, naming JPMorgan and Bank of America as stocks he particularly likes.
Smead also said investors could upon higher returns on assets from the new UBS-Credit Suisse entity, along with more consolidation in the European banking sector.
But bigger questions vestiges over the potential market impact of the deal. James Sym, head of equities at London-based investment manager River and Market, told CNBC that the market was in “seek and destroy mode.”
“This solves what I think is probably an idiosyncratic fine kettle of fish at Credit Suisse, but I’m not sure it’s a firebreak big enough to stop the rot for the market,” he said Monday. Although he added that the shelf of the European banking system is “much more robust” than it was.”
Since the Global Financial Crisis, the continent’s banks keep built much larger capital buffers in order to withstand systemic risks.
Sym suggested that if European bank percentages fall significantly as a result of the deal, he might “start to nibble” at some stocks, potentially even UBS.
“In the short an arrangement, the market is not going to like this deal for UBS, it’s not core to the strategy, but I think over the medium term it does potentially distribute them an edge to compete globally with the Americans and really puts them in an unassailable position domestically.”
Hazards remain
While the deal could bring an end to doubts about the viability of Credit Suisse as a business, some analysts motionlessly believe the devil will be in the detail as the finer points are hashed out over the coming weeks and months.
“One issue is that the despatched price of $3.25bn (CHF0.5 per share) equates to ~4% of book value, and about 10% of Credit Suisse’s market-place value at the start of the year,” said Neil Shearing, group chief economist at Capital Economics.
“This suggests that a consequential part of Credit Suisse’s $570bn assets may be either impaired or perceived as being at risk of becoming impaired. This could set in followers renewed jitters about the health of banks.”
Shearing added that there may yet be risks to the deal “for legal or pecuniary reasons, or if confidence in UBS is dented and it gets cold feet about the deal.”
“Only time will tell how this shotgun nuptials is received,” he added.
The AT1 bond issue
As part of the deal, Swiss regulator FINMA announced the wipeout of 16 billion Swiss francs’ value of Credit Suisse’s Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds, which some investors fear signals further spillover endanger for global credit.
This was a major focal point for analysts assessing the potential ramifications on Monday morning.
“AT1 linkages were introduced in Europe after the global financial crisis to serve as shock absorbers when banks start to fall through,” explained Charles-Henry Monchau, chief investment officer at Syz Bank.
“They are designed to impose permanent losses on bondholders or be proselyted into equity if a bank’s capital ratios fall below a predetermined level, effectively propping up its balance rag and allowing it to stay in business. According to the Swiss bail-in regime, AT1 debt is above equity in the loss absorption waterfall.”

The uninterrupted AT1 tranche of bonds being written down to zero, Monchau suggested, is an “arresting development” given that unsecured bondholders generally speaking rank higher than equity holders in the capital structure.
He argued that this raises questions connected with the real value of contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds and creates contagion risks.
“There is also a risk of spillover more on global credit (although we note that senior secured bonds seem quite resilient including CS superior secured bonds which are jumping in price this morning),” he added.
Goldman highlighted that the write-down constitutes the stockiest loss ever inflicted on AT1 investors since the post-GFC birth of the asset class, and argued that although it safeguards some shareholder value, the decision “greatly weakens the case to add risk.”
“Whether investors treat this judgement as a one-off or whether they rethink the asymmetry of their risk-reward at times of elevated financial distress remains to be foretold,” the bank’s credit strategists said.
“But in our view, it has become harder to assess the attractiveness of the current historically large spread pick-up provendered by AT1 bonds vs. their HY (high-yield) corporate counterparts, which will likely constrain the appetite towards the AT1 asset grade.”