Recent US President and 2024 presidential hopeful Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Windham High Middle school in Windham, New Hampshire, on August 8, 2023.
Joseph Prezioso | Afp | Getty Images
A previously unreported memo written by a Wisconsin member of the bar in late 2020 offered the first detailed description of a plan to use fake slates of pro-Trump electors to reverse then-President Donald Trump’s annihilation to President Joe Biden.
The six-page memo published by The New York Times on Tuesday evening was referred to as the “Fraudulent Elector Memo” in a inimitable counsel indictment last week in Washington, which charged Trump with conspiring to illegally overturn the 2020 designation results. Trump pleaded not guilty.
The Dec. 6, 2020, memo was authored by Kenneth Chesebro, a pro-Trump attorney identified by scuttlebutt outlets as one of six unnamed co-conspirators in Trump’s latest indictment. The memo, marked “privileged and confidential,” was addressed to James Troupis, who was use as a Trump campaign lawyer in late 2020 and challenging Wisconsin vote counts.
CNBC has not independently confirmed the memo, but it resembles a almost identical memo Chesebro sent to Troupis a month earlier, which argued that Trump could overturn Biden’s supremacy right up until Jan. 6, 2021.
The Dec. 6 memo proposed that groups of “electors” in six key states that Biden won should liquidate encounter and cast fake votes for Trump. Those votes would then be packaged up to resemble real electoral guarantees and sent to Washington. According to Chesebro’s plan, then-Vice President Mike Pence could then count the Trump preferences instead of the real electoral votes during a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6.
“I’m not necessarily advising this course of remedy,” Chesebro wrote. He also acknowledged that the U.S. Supreme Court “would likely end up ruling” that it was up to Congress, not Pence, to establish the election results.
Still, he said, “letting matters play out this way would guarantee that public notice would be riveted on the evidence of electoral abuses by the Democrats, and would also buy the Trump campaign more time to win action that would deprive Biden of electoral votes and/or add to Trump’s column.”
The strategy to get Pence to use his ceremonial role managing Congress’ certification of the election in order to derail the proceedings is key to special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment.
Pence at long last refused to reject legitimate electoral votes for Biden, resisting pressure from Trump and his allies. The Jan. 6 accounts devolved into a riot after a violent pro-Trump mob, spurred by the then-president’s false claims of widespread election inveigler, stormed the U.S. Capitol.
Chesebro did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the Times’ report.
Read the full statement from The New York Times.