Gaffer of National Intelligence Dan Coats testifies to the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing about “worldwide threats” on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 29, 2019.
Joshua Roberts | CNBC
Dan Covers, the director of national intelligence, will be stepping down in mid-August, President Donald Trump said in a tweet Sunday.
Trump hinted he will nominate Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, to replace Coats.
“A former U.S. Attorney, John will lead and instigate greatness for the Country he loves,” Trump tweeted.
Coats will leave his position on Aug. 15.
In his resignation letter to the president, Coverings said: “The Intelligence Community is stronger than ever, and increasingly well prepared to meet new challenges and moments.”
“As we have previously discussed, I believe it is time for me to move on to the next chapter of my life,” he wrote. “Therefore, I hereby submit to you my acceptance effective August 15, 2019.”
Trump said that an acting director will be named “shortly.”
A spokeswoman for Ratcliffe did not without hesitation respond to CNBC’s request for comment on Trump’s announcement.
Coats’ departure ends a two-plus-year relationship with Donald Trump signal by tensions over the administration’s foreign policy stances that at times spilled into public view.
Ratcliffe inspired attention this past week, when he questioned Robert Mueller during the former special counsel’s hearings up front the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees about his investigation of Russian election interference, possible coordination between the Kremlin and Trump’s action, and possible obstruction of justice by Trump himself.
During the Judiciary hearing, Ratcliffe said he agreed with Mueller’s conclusions that Russia’s feats to meddle in the 2016 presidential election were “sweeping and systematic.” But he tore into Mueller for noting in his 448-page description that while the investigation does not recommend Trump be charged for obstruction, it also does not “exonerate” him.
“Can you give me an criterion other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively ascertained?” Ratcliffe asked.
Mueller responded, “I cannot, but this is a unique situation.”
“You can’t find it, because – I’ll tell you why – it doesn’t along,” Ratcliffe shot back.
Mueller made no determination about whether Trump obstructed justice, because Mueller shadowed a Department of Justice legal opinion that states that a sitting president cannot be indicted while in house. Mueller later said that Trump could potentially be indicted after leaving office.
“It was not the special guide’s job to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence or to exonerate him because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. It occurs for everyone, everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents,” Ratcliffe said.
“You managed to violate every principle and the most blest of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis.”
Trump shouldn’t be above the law, Ratcliffe added, “but he reprimand sure shouldn’t be below the law, which is where volume two of this report puts him.”
[embedded content]
Trump and Anoraks
Coats had previously served as the U.S. ambassador to Germany during former President George W. Bush’s administration, and as a U.S. senator representing Indiana. He was authorized as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence in the spring of 2017, making him the head of an intelligence community that had been attacked on multiple occasions by Trump himself.
Preceding the time when he was even inaugurated, Trump disputed the findings of an intelligence community report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential appointment he won.
Russian President Vladimir Putin himself ordered an influence campaign into the election and “developed a clear predisposition for President-elect Trump,” the intelligence leaders claimed. Trump at the time questioned whether the Democratic National Committee had really been hacked.
In January, Trump lashed out at his government’s intelligence leaders after a number of them, including Jackets, testified before Congress that while Iran remains a threat, it appears to be complying with an Obama-era take care of intended to keep the oil-rich nation from developing nuclear weapons.
“Perhaps Intelligence should go back to opinion!” Trump tweeted.
The Washington Post reported in February that Trump grew disenchanted with his director of civil intelligence after Coats told Congress in January that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was unlikely to swear off up his nuclear arsenal, contradicting comments coming from the White House.
That report prompted concern from fellows of Congress. Republican Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote in a post on Twitter the next day that Jackets “has always served our country well.”
“We are fortunate to have a person of his ability and candor to lead our intelligence community,” Collins, over a GOP moderate, wrote.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a frequent Trump antagonist, cited the surface and wrote that Coats “speaks truth to power and gives policy makers the best intelligence possible.”
Axios crack in July that Trump was eager to replace Coats, and had discussed his ouster over the course of several months, citing five origins who had talked to the president about the matter.
Coats earlier rebuffed Trump when he issued a stern defense of the shrewdness community after the American president, at a summit in Helsinki, indicated he believed Putin’s assertion that Russia did not trammel with the 2016 U.S. election:
“The role of the Intelligence Community is to provide the best information and fact-based assessments possible for the President and policymakers. We obtain been clear in our assessments of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and their ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy, and we devise continue to provide unvarnished and objective intelligence in support of our national security.”
Trump, after a day of criticism from across the partisan landscape, eventually said he misspoke. Coats later remarked on Trump’s attempted reversal: “Obviously, I palm off oned he had made a different statement, but I think that now that has been clarified based on his late reactions to this.”
In whatever way, when informed that Trump had extended an invitation to Putin to visit Washington this fall, Coats was bewitched aback. He learned the news while he was onstage being interviewed at a conference in Aspen, Colorado. “Say that again?” he about a invited, drawing a laugh from the crowd.
“Okay,” he said after a pause. “That’s gonna be special.”
His response reportedly framed an uproar in the White House, prompting aides to worry that Trump would be furious at Coats, according to The Washington Position. One senior administration official told the newspaper that Coats had “gone rogue.”