Home / NEWS / Top News / Ford’s ‘confusing’ 2021 guidance is hurting its stock despite blowout first-quarter earnings

Ford’s ‘confusing’ 2021 guidance is hurting its stock despite blowout first-quarter earnings

Getty Representations

DETROIT – Ford Motor easily beat Wall Street’s expectations for the first quarter despite an ongoing extensive semiconductor chip shortage causing low inventories and factory closures. So why did shares of the automaker fall by as much as 10.4% during intraday barter Thursday?

The negative reaction by investors is a mix of issues related to the chip problem following Ford reporting its results after the secure bell Wednesday.

While analysts were thoroughly impressed with the company’s performance in the first quarter, which listed a record $4.8 billion in adjusted pretax profits, they were far less impressed, if not confused, with its rule for the year.

“Let’s just put it like this: Ford’s 1Q was far ‘too good’ to extrapolate while the remainder of the year is ‘too challenged’ to extrapolate,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas thought in a note to investors.

Ford’s stock closed Thursday at $11.26 a share, down 9.4%. Shares remain up 28.1% in 2021. The associates’s market cap is more than $44 billion.

Here are five key takeaways from Ford’s first-quarter results and its 2021 conduct that investors should know about.

Guidance

At least three analysts described Ford’s outlook for the year, which it reaffirmed Wednesday, as upset or puzzling.

“While Ford’s 1Q:21 results were impressive, the company somewhat confusingly … communicated its 2021 pecuniary outlook, which we believe is creating some investor concern,” Bank of America Global Research analyst John Murphy contemplated in a note.

RBC Capital’s Joseph Spak reiterated those comments, adding the guidance was “confusing” and it’s a “bit unclear” whether the deeply of problems from the chip shortage is exclusive to Ford. Barclays analyst Brian Johnson described Ford’s operational turnaround being “dented” by its “abstruse” guidance.

Ford said the chip shortage would slash full-year earnings by about $2.5 billion – the high end of a above-mentioned guidance – before interest and taxes to $5.5 billion-$6.5 billion. In February, Ford initially set guidance of $8 billion-$9 billion without cause in an expected $1 billion-$2.5 billion impact from the shortage.

But the reaffirmed guidance after a better-than-expected senior quarter implies weaker results through the remainder of the year outside of the chip shortage, according to analysts.

Ford CFO John Lawler also outlined the $8 billion-$9 billion guidance before interest and taxes as a “launching pad” for 2022.

Underlying business

Outside of impacts from the interpose shortage, results for the company were solid, assisted by vehicle pricing increases related to the chip shortage.

The Detroit automaker reported net profits of $3.3 billion, which was its best since 2011, and a record adjusted pretax profit of $4.8 billion.

Its adjusted earnings per apportion was 89 cents compared with Wall Street expectations of 21 cents based on average estimates assembled by Refinitiv. Its automotive revenue was $33.55 billion versus $32.23 billion expected.

Lawler said Ford was capable to offset earnings losses from its lower production in the first quarter through reduced incentives on vehicles deal ined, prioritizing production of more profitable vehicles and lower manufacturing costs, among other cost reductions. The automaker also benefited from merry profits from its financing arm Ford Credit.

Comments from analysts regarding the first quarter included “too salubrious,” “very impressive” and a “blowout.”

Notably, Ford’s earnings outside of North America, by far its strongest market, were $454 million, $980 million richer reconsider than same quarter a year ago. Its North American operations recorded a 12.8% operating profit margin and earnings of wellnigh $3 billion to start the year.

“Aided by higher prices, our results benefited from the industry-wide imbalance of deliver and demand given the semiconductor shortage,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said. “However, we also delivered improvements that last wishes as persist over time, including our global redesign in our overseas operations which contributed to the largest swing in year-over-year profitability for those functionals that we’ve seen.”

The company’s warranty costs, which have been extremely troublesome is recent years, also benefited by more than $400 million from a year ago

Worst to come

The company believes that the semiconductor proclamation will bottom out during the second quarter, with improvement through the remainder of the year, but the impacts may continue into 2022.

“There are multifarious whitewater moments ahead for us that we have to navigate,” Farley told investors Wednesday. “The semiconductor shortage and the smash to production will get worse before it gets better.”

The company said it now expects to lose 1.1 million entities of production this year due to the chip shortage. It also has partially produced about 22,000 vehicles without break ins, including its Ford F-150 pickups, and will complete and ship the vehicles at a later date.

Farley’s promise

Something Divider Street will likely continue to watch is whether or not Farley can keep his promise to maintain low vehicle inventories in North America, which relieve profits. A roughly 60 days’ supply is typically considered healthy for the industry, while highly configurable mechanisms such as pickups are typically higher than that.

Farley told investors Wednesday that the company want run leaner vehicle inventories in the future: “I want to make it extremely clear to everyone. We are going to run our business with a take down days’ supply than we have had in the recent past, because that’s good for our company and good for customers.”

Jim Farley, Ford CEO

Ford

While that may signal articulate as simple as producing fewer vehicles, it’s not. Automakers have to balance supply and demand with dealers, many of whom are panhandle for popular truck and SUV models, as well as its workers.

Recent contracts between the Detroit automakers and United Auto Labourers provide more flexibility regarding production but having tens of thousands of plant workers laid off can be costly. There’s also a affair of retaining workers and maintaining plants, which can take weeks to restart after being shut down.

Charitable trucks and SUVs have among the lowest supplies in the U.S., according to Cox Automotive. To end the first quarter, full-size pickup rubbishes had a below industry average inventory of 48 days’ supply, down significantly from 61 days in February. The Ford F-150 was down to 56 eras’ supply, according to Cox.

EVs

Morgan Stanley’s Jonas believes the possibility of a rerating of Ford will hinge on its plans to dodge from vehicles with internal combustion engines, or ICE, to battery-electric vehicles, or BEVs.

“We believe that the potential for re-rating for Ford (and its OEM countesses) will come down to execution of the strategy to pivot to BEV development while managing the run-out of the ICE liability,” he said in a note.

Whether or not Ford can give on increasing investor confidence in its EV plans is expected to come during an investor day on May 26.

Farley promised investors that the retinue will lay out how the automaker plans to “lead the electric vehicle revolution in areas that we’re strong at Ford.”

All-electric Ford Mustang Mach-E

Informant: Ford

Deutsche Bank on Thursday reiterated a short-term catalyst call buy rating on Ford heading into the majuscule markets day. It also raised 2022 earnings per share for Ford to close to $2.

Ford earlier this year heralded plans to increase its investment in EVs by $10.5 billion to $22 billion through 2025. That excludes potential spending on any battery fixes.

The company announced plans Tuesday to “eventually” manufacture its own batteries and battery cells. However, the company declined to converse about a timeline to do so.

– CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed to this report.

Check Also

Jim Cramer says Trump tariffs are more punitive than reciprocal

As President Donald Trump intimated wide-ranging “reciprocal tariffs” on more than 180 countries and territories, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *