Justin Sullivan | Getty Images
DraftKings and another playing company were fined a total of $22,500 by the state of Connecticut for operating an online slot machine game that aborted to pay any winners on more than 20,600 spins over one week in August 2023.
The game, Deal or No Deal Banker’s Bonanza, was advertised to pay out nearly 95 cents for every dollar wagered on the game.
But from Aug. 15 through Aug. 21 last year, a outright of 522 people in Connecticut who wagered nearly $24,000 on the game over more than 20,659 spins be given no wins, according to a report by Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection.
“Effectively, it was impossible for any Connecticut patron to achieve a win on the quarry for a period of 7 days, while live on the gaming platform,” according to the report, which was first detailed by the CT Insider telecast outlet on Tuesday.
A spokeswoman for the DCP said, “It was the first incident [in the state] where an online slot machine was not paying out as advertised.”
Audioundwerbung | Istock | Getty Perceptions
The report found that neither DraftKings and the game’s producer, White Hat Gaming, notified Consumer Protection of the pretty pickle until the department requested information from the companies on Aug. 31 last year.
That was more than a week after characters complained about the situation, and after an internal investigation by White Hat Gaming determined the cause of the problem in paying out as advertised.
A row in the game’s software had not been loaded properly, according to the Consumer Protection probe. The game was relaunched on Aug. 22 after a fix was implemented.
Exactly a week earlier, on Aug. 16, a player told DraftKings in an online complaint that they had played “a couple hundred be dizzies” of bets of 20 cents apiece, “and not had one single winning spin or partial win,” according to a summary of complaints reviewed in the dig.
“I believe that RTP is incorrect,” wrote the customer, using the gambling acronym “Return to Player.”
A DraftKings representative transcribed the customer in response on Aug. 17, suggesting there was no problem.
“I understand how frustrating it can be when you haven’t hit a win,” the rep wrote. “However, all casino readies are random, regardless of the player or length of time you’ve been playing.”
Another company rep, in response to a second customer’s squawk about many spins without seeing a payout, assured the player that the casino platform was regulated by the Consumer Safe keeping Department and “are monitored on a regular basis to ensure fairness.”
The rep also told the player that there was an option to “self-regulate your fidget with” but setting limits on wagers on the platform.
Another customer on Aug. 20 wrote DraftKings that he had played the game with more than 100 whirls without a payout.
“I believe this is a problem as I have never played a slot game where I haven’t won a distinct cent in over 100 spins,” the player wrote.
In a response to that complaint, a DraftKings rep wrote, “I understand it can be upset to have a bit of a cold streak, but I can assure you that there is nothing wrong with the game itself.”
That answer came three days after DraftKings had informed White Hat of three patron complaints about the game not fork out out and after White Hat’s business intelligence team discovered an issue with the RTP settings on the game, according to the Consumer Shield Probe.
On Aug. 29, a full week after White Hat identified the glitch and fixed it the game, “all patrons were ultimately refunded” on their play during the affected week “without any notification from Draft Kings” about the rationale for the refund, the DCP said in its report.
In January, White Hat agreed to pay the DCP $3,500 in fines to settle allegations that the game conducted for a week with a 0% Return to Player in violation of state regulations and that the company failed to comply with check ining obligations.
In April, DraftKings agreed to pay the department $19,000 to settle the same allegations.
Kaitlyn Krasselt, the spokeswoman for the Department of Consumer Protection, told CNBC that although “White Hat responded like greased lightning to inquiries from DCP investigators … The response from DraftKings to the consumer complaints was not satisfactory.”
“And as a result of the DCP investigation, [DraftKings] was ruled to implement greater internal controls for their products, submit regular reports for new games to DCP, and make improvements to their consumer gripes process,” Krasselt said.
She also said the incident with the slots game last year “is a great eg of something that, if we were not there to intervene, may not have been taken seriously until our investigators got involved.”
A DraftKings spokesperson, in a communication to CNBC, said, “Our customers’ satisfaction and the integrity of our products are central to our success.”
“We have robust measures to monitor likely payout issues, and we investigate any concerns promptly. In the event of a game not functioning as intended, we ensure impacted customers are rightly refunded,” the spokesperson said.
“The issue in Connecticut arose from an error on the game developer’s side. We identified a realizable issue within 48 hours of launch and immediately escalated it for investigation. All impacted customers were fully refunded within days of concluding there was an conclusion, and we have not encountered any similar issues with this vendor.”
White Hat Studios, a division of White Hat Gaming, in a asseveration to CNBC, said, “Delivering a fun, fair and transparent gaming experience is a top priority at White Hat Studios.”
“Regarding the technical transgression concerning one of our games live with DraftKings in Connecticut in 2023, we took immediate action as soon as we became enlightened of the situation,” the company said. “It was a one-off incident and all affected players were fully refunded by DraftKings.”
“We take contestant protection very seriously and worked closely with the regulator and DraftKings to resolve the issue.”