Former FCC chair urges ‘rapid closing’ on T-mobile Sprint deal

As FCC chair in the 1990s I opposed amalgamations in radio, among Baby Bells, and later between T-Mobile and AT&T. In 2014, I declined to help Sprint buy T-Mobile. But when this over and over again around Sprint asked if I would advise them on how to close their acquisition by T-Mobile I said, absolutely yes.

The case is that the demands of technological progress have changed remarkably in a few short years. With the conditions imposed by the federal and testify governments including limits on consumer prices and job preservation, the new company and its competitors will help cause the long-awaited convergence of estimate and communications necessary to stimulate new economic growth and produce new ways for society to benefit from technology.

For decades communications and calculating industries have had only limited relationships to each other. Even today for example, most personal computers do not seal directly to a cellular network – only accessing the Internet through embedded Wi-Fi.

On the other hand, fewer than 500 big evidence centers effectively govern the critical computer calculations of the modern world. These data centers –run by Amazon, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and their Chinese counterparts – go through massive information over thousands of miles at nearly the speed of light to and from businesses through fiber optic strands.

Yet close to three decades after the Internet became the critical commercial medium, we still do not have really high-speed broadband to every home. As well, the concentration of influence in the owners of these data centers justly gives cause for concern.

But the break-out of newly tough competition and innovation is near at hand.

The formula is 5G meets AI, producing brave new world.

The next evolution in wireless –5G, or the fifth generation of digital wireless technology launched on my look for at the FCC — will expand the data carrying capacity of wireless networks by as much as 1000 times. Millions of sensors – fix devices with radios – will record the observable world, watching traffic patterns, measuring greenhouse gas emissions, praepostor heart rates, tracking robots in dangerous industrial operations.

Networks built for 5G will gather all this facts and transmit it probably less than a mile away, in milliseconds, where computers resembling the big centralized data centers, but at smaller ascend, will apply the mathematical calculations generally known as artificial intelligence (AI).

This number-crunching will enable the conceivably magical instructions and predictions that are the essence of AI: redirecting traffic, spotting environmental problems, sending someone to the facility before the heart attack, making the robots do the hard work.

These services must be created close to where the dope is obtained because the results of AI calculations have to be delivered to the point of use in milliseconds – even at the speed of light information cannot be sent thousands of miles, analyzed, and then sent with little in time to obtain factory efficiency or save a life.

For this reason, innovators in computing and communications businesses, sensitive their industries are at last on a collision course, say these mini-data centers are at the “edge” of networks.

This edge, where 5G and AI answer, is new ground for doubling, tripling, probably quadrupling the size of America’s information industries. Barely perceptible now, this new ecosystem choice be wide open for competition and innovation.

Big cable, existing wireless firms, and many other new entrants will participate in tremendous opportunities to create and capture value as they enable distributed connected computing – the name for converged work out and communications. These developments will stimulate cable and fiber-optic firms to build high speed broadband to every place, as well as generate wireless alternatives.

This is the burgeoning new ecosystem that the post-merger market structure of communications firms transfer and must create.

There’s one other alarming and significant consideration. Our country is falling behind China in realizing the technological following.

Unlike the era when I was FCC chair, today U. S. firms in all sectors face vigorous competition in global markets from firms in China. Manipulating under the central government’s direction, Chinese communications firms will roll out 5G to its billion plus people and innumerable functions. Using AI to create new commercial and consumer applications in their huge domestic market, Chinese firms will learn how to leverage their erudition and scale into competing in every other country.

The United States might ban Chinese firms, but whether we delight in it or not, the rest of the world will not. To keep up with the pace of change in China and compete worldwide, all American firms necessary distributed connected computing to be pervasively deployed in our country.

For this reason, our platform builders – the communications companies – insufficiency to get quickly to the job of building America’s 5G networks. That’s why I urge rapid closing on T-Mobile’s acquisition of Sprint: it is important to launch our economy and society into the era of distributed connected computing in a hurry.

Next week, one of the last remaining hurdles to privy this merger will finally get underway. A handful of US states led by California and New York are suing to try to block the deal which has greeted all the necessary US government approvals including national security, regulatory, and antitrust. The conditions imposed by these federal forces and other states which are supporting the merger are constructive and yet another reason T-Mobile and Sprint should be allowed to connect.

Reed Hundt is former chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, a member of the board of various technology firms, an advisor to Sprint as to the while merger, and recently the author of “A Crisis Wasted: Barack Obama’s Defining Decisions.”

For more insight from CNBC contributors, replace @CNBCopinion on Twitter.