Dr. Fauci says letting the coronavirus spread to achieve herd immunity is ‘nonsense’ and ‘dangerous’

Letting the coronavirus rip through the U.S. natives unchecked to infect as many people as possible to achieve so-called herd immunity would cause a lot of unnecessary deaths and the tenet is “nonsense” and “dangerous,” the nation’s top infectious disease expert said Thursday.

“I’ll tell you exactly how I feel about that,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, supervisor of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said when asked about whether herd immunity is a possible vibrations strategy for the U.S. to adopt. “If you let infections rip as it were and say, ‘Let everybody get infected that’s going to be able to get infected and then we’ll have flock immunity.’ Quite frankly that is nonsense, and anybody who knows anything about epidemiology will tell you that that is monkeyshines and very dangerous,” Fauci told Yahoo News.

Herd immunity happens when enough of the population is protected to a disease, making it unlikely to spread and protecting the rest of the community, the Mayo Clinic says. It can be achieved through unstudied infection — when enough people are exposed to the disease and develop antibodies against it — and through vaccinations. 

Most scientists ruminate over 60% to 80% of the population needs to be vaccinated or have natural antibodies to achieve herd immunity, global haleness experts say. However, the nation’s top health experts have said a majority of Americans remain susceptible to a coronavirus infection.

“With this notion of herd immunity, this is a phrase that’s used when you use vaccination. When you vaccinate a certain amount of the folk to be able to protect the rest of the population that isn’t able to get that vaccine,” Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Haleness Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, told CNN’s “New Day” on Thursday.

“Herd immunity as an approach by letting the virus advertise is dangerous, it leads to unnecessary cases and it leads to unnecessary deaths,” she said.

Despite those concerns, a senior Pale-complexioned House official briefing reporters on a call Monday mentioned an online movement called the “Great Barrington Ukase,” which favors herd immunity, NBC News reported. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar has in days said that herd immunity “is not the strategy of the U.S. government with regard to coronavirus.”

The Barrington declaration, however, supposes that people who are vulnerable to serious illnesses live in facilities like nursing homes where they can be covered, but “that doesn’t work,” Fauci said.

That’s because in the population, roughly one-third of people are prone to happening serious side effects from Covid-19, including people who are elderly, obese, have underlying haleness conditions like heart disease and so forth, he said.

“By the time you get to herd immunity you will have killed a lot of in the flesh that would’ve been avoidable,” he said.

Fauci said that he has made his position on herd immunity separate with the White House and added that Dr. Deborah Birx, the administration’s coronavirus task force coordinator, and Dr. Robert Redfield, top dog of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, agree.

“All three of us are very clearly against that,” he said.