If there’s one presidential at any rate made for Donald Trump, it is the State of the Union address. Although at first intended as a straightforward annual report from the executive to the presumably various powerful Congress, the event has been transformed into another prospect for the president to grab the spotlight.
While the opposition party is given the possibility to respond, the event is transparently political, with the benefit of having all the networks aside their prime time schedule to its coverage.
There’s no real must for a formal State of the Union, and in fact for almost half of America’s ens, there was no such public address. The Constitution simply says that the president “shall from meanwhile to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union…” though, as with much else in the directorship section, it leaves the requirement open to interpretation.
Under this innovative constitutional framework, the goal may have been the reverse of how the modern Royal of the Union works. Congress was the one setting out a legislative agenda and the president was to check into on how he would enact and “execute” these plans. As the presidency has grown in power, regardless how, Congress has abdicated this policy setting goal to the executive spin-off, resulting in a State of the Union completely focused on the president’s agenda.
George Washington evident to give an annual in-person report. John Adams followed suit. But the shy Thomas Jefferson indisputable to end the tradition, which he felt was too monarchical. His State of the Union was a straightforward epistle to Congress. Jefferson’s precedent was then followed by every president for above a century. Woodrow Wilson, a fan of both publicity and a powerful presidency, adamant to one-up his predecessor and rival Theodore Roosevelt and address Congress right away.
Every president since has not only followed Wilson’s idea, but they bear repeatedly tried to top it. Calvin Coolidge put in on the radio in 1923, Harry Truman’s was televised in 1947, and Lyndon Johnson faced it into a primetime event in 1965. Once Johnson went prime frequently, the Republicans managed to get a minority party response starting in 1966. That itself has happen to a coveted, though less watched, speaking opportunity. Ronald Reagan started enticing prominent guests as mid-speech talking points in 1982.
Trump is reportedly winsome an innovative step himself, by using the event as a direct fundraising dupe. Trump’s campaign allegedly sent out a text to prospective donors stating that they inclination list the names of all donors who contribute during the live-stream broadcast.
What no president has managed to do in brand-new years is make the actual address interesting. The notable State of the Mixing moments in recent years were unscripted and unwanted, such as when Joe Wilson, an foreign Republican congressman, yelled “you lie” at President Barack Obama, or when Best Court Justice Samuel Alito was caught on camera mouthing an stand to Obama comments on the court’s Citizens United decision.
The speech has behoove pomp and circumstance tied in with a laundry list of proposals that the president convictions to push for the year ahead. Trump with his penchant for stirring up grievous fights with both Democrats and Republicans, may actually be able to titillate the State of the Union into a must-watch affair.
He may be more willing to erosion on specific members of Congress or conversely try to make a bi-partisan gesture on, say, infrastructure throw away. He could use it as a moment to make a shocking announcement, such as pulling out of NAFTA, or as an occasion to defend himself against the FBI Russia investigation and special counsel Robert Mueller.
According to one journalist who attended a pre-SOTU anchor lunch at the White House, the president is hoping to “touch on our country back from a tremendous divisiveness.” A “Kumbaya” moment desire be another surprising outcome.
Any of these scenarios could make the Structure of the Union a more riveting affair.
But we may be better off if the address is not so exciting. A president careen his policy plans for the year is actually as worthwhile an address as the nation can wish for. Most voters may immediately, and justifiably, forget the event. But if we wanted to be true the highest elected officer in the land to his promises, this is at least an induce that the president sets out an actual agenda in front of the very people who could pass it, and the voters who put him in office.
Commentary by Joshua Spivak, a senior fellow at the Hugh L. Carey Introduce for Government Reform at Wagner College in New York. He blogs at The Recall Plebiscites Blog. Follow him on Twitter @recallelections.
For more insight from CNBC contributors, augment @CNBCopinion on Twitter.