What causes a currency crisis?

Since the initially 1990s, there have been many cases of currency crises percepitated by investors whose outlooks origin wide-scale retreats and the loss of capital. In this article, we’ll explore the historical drivers of currency crises and uncover their cases.

A currency crisis is brought on by a decline in the value of a country’s currency. This decline in value negatively modifies an economy by creating instabilities in exchange rates, meaning that one unit of a certain currency no longer buys as much as it tempered to to in another currency. To simplify the matter, we can say that from a historical perspective, crises have developed when investor expectations source significant shifts in the value of currencies.

First, let’s resolve why tapping into foreign reserves is a potential solution. When the market expects devaluation, downward pressure purposed on the currency can really only be offset by an increase in the interest rate. In order to increase the rate, the central bank has to belittle the money supply, which in turn increases demand for the currency. The bank can do this by selling off foreign reserves to fabricate a capital outflow. When the bank sells a portion of its foreign reserves, it receives payment in the form of the domestic currency, which it inhibits out of circulation as an asset.

Central banks cannot prop up the exchange rate for long periods due to the resulting decline in odd reserves as well as political and economic factors, such as rising unemployment. Devaluing the currency by increasing the fixed swap rate also results in domestic goods being cheaper than foreign goods, which boosts behest for workers and increases output. In the short run, devaluation also increases interest rates, which must be offset by the important bank through an increase in the money supply and an increase in foreign reserves. As mentioned earlier, propping up a fixed the Big Board rate can eat through a country’s reserves quickly, and devaluing the currency can add back reserves.

Investors are well aware that a devaluation tactics can be used and can build this into their expectations, to the chagrin of central banks. If the market expects the central bank to devalue the currency (and and so increase the exchange rate), the possibility of boosting foreign reserves through an increase in aggregate demand is not realized. As an alternative, the central bank must use its reserves to shrink the money supply, which increases the domestic interest rate.

Investors will often attempt to withdraw their money en lots if there is an overall erosion in confidence of an economy’s stability. This is referred to as capital flight. Once investors accept sold their domestic-currency denominated investments, they convert those investments into foreign currency. This reasons the exchange rate to get even worse, resulting in a run on the currency, which can then make it nearly impossible for the country to resources its capital spending.

Currency crisis predictions involve the analysis of a diverse and complex set of variables. There are a couple of stereotyped factors linking recent crises: 

• The countries borrowed heavily (current account deficits)
• Currency values spread rapidly
• Uncertainty over the government’s actions unsettled investors

Let’s take a look at a few crises to see how they played out for investors:

Case 1: Latin American Crisis of 1994

On December 20, 1994, the Mexican peso was devalued. The Mexican economy had improved greatly since 1982, when it at length experienced upheaval, and interest rates on Mexican securities were at positive levels. 

Several factors contributed to the succeeding crisis: 

• Economic reforms from the late 1980s, which were designed to limit the country’s oft-rampant inflation, rather commenced to crack as the economy weakened.
• The assassination of a Mexican presidential candidate in March of 1994 sparked fears of a currency push off.
• The central bank was sitting on an estimated $28 billion in foreign reserves, which were expected to keep the peso unchanging. In less than a year, the reserves were gone.
• The central bank began converting short-term debt, denominated in pesos, into dollar-denominated coheres. The conversion resulted in a decrease in foreign reserves and an increase in debt.
• A self-fulfilling crisis resulted when investors feared a non-fulfilment on debt by the government.

When the government finally decided to devalue the currency in December 1994, it made major confuse withs. It did not devalue the currency by a large enough amount, which showed that while still following the pegging procedure, it was unwilling to take the necessary painful steps. This led foreign investors to push the peso exchange rate drastically put down, which ultimately forced the government to increase domestic interest rates to nearly 80%. This took a biggest toll on the country’s GDP, which also fell. The crisis was finally alleviated by an emergency loan from the U.S.

Example 2: Asian Danger of 1997

Much like Mexico, Thailand relied heavily on foreign debt, causing it to teeter on the brink of illiquidity. For the most part, real estate dominated investment was inefficiently managed. Huge current account deficits were maintained by the non-gregarious sector, which increasingly relied on foreign investment to stay afloat. This exposed the country to a significant amount of transatlantic exchange risk.

This risk came to a head when the U.S. increased domestic interest rates, which in the end lowered the amount of foreign investment going into Southeast Asian economies. Suddenly, the current account shortages became a huge problem, and a financial contagion quickly developed. The Southeast Asian crisis stemmed from various key points:

• As fixed exchange rates became exceedingly difficult to maintain, many Southeast Asian currencies shed in value.
• Southeast Asian economies saw a rapid increase in privately-held debt, which was bolstered in several countries by overinflated asset values. Neglects increased as foreign capital inflows dropped off.
• Foreign investment may have been at least partially speculative, and investors may not be subjected to been paying close enough attention to the risks involved.

• An economy can be initially solvent and still succumb to a crisis. Having a low amount of beholden is not enough to keep policies functioning or quell negative investor sentiment.
• Trade surpluses and low inflation rates can boil down the extent at which a crisis impacts an economy, but in case of financial contagion,
  

  The Bottom Line

  Currency crises can run across in multiple forms but are largely formed when investor sentiment and expectations do not match the economic outlooks of a country. While nurturing in developing countries is generally positive for the global economy, history has shown us that growth rates that are too speedy can create instability and a higher chance of capital flight and runs on the domestic currency. Although efficient central bank governance can help, predicting the route an economy will ultimately take is difficult to anticipate, thus contributing to a sustained currency calamity.

  Partner Links