Home / MARKETS / Trump threw stimulus checks back into play and called for a large economic aid package — but Republicans still aren’t backing more spending

Trump threw stimulus checks back into play and called for a large economic aid package — but Republicans still aren’t backing more spending

  • Trump excused on Republicans to back more spending, but he’s appeared to sway very few GOP senators.
  • Many Republican senators staunchly take a stand against more federal spending, citing the debt.
  • “The core disagreement: Are we trying to get the economy back up and running or should we safeguard it shut down?” conservative economist Oren Cass told Business Insider.
  • The impasse threatens to prolong the downturn for millions of people undisturbed receiving unemployment benefits.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump threw the on the cards of another round of stimulus checks back into play earlier this week, calling for Republicans to get behind another big aid combine.

But the Senate GOP hasn’t been swayed so far — and they’re doubling down on their reluctance to approve more federal dish out after Democrats blocked a slimmed-down $300 billion package last week.

On Wednesday, Trump tweeted that Republicans should “go for the much squiffy numbers” on coronavirus aid. He later praised a $1.5 trillion relief plan that a bipartisan group of 50 Lineage lawmakers put forward.

“Some of the Republicans disagree, but I think I can convince them to go along with that because I homologous to the larger number,” Trump said at a press conference. “I want to see people get money.”

However, top Senate Republicans without hesitation threw cold water on the idea.

“This used to be the White House versus Pelosi up until about now — now the president’s rush at in and saying we can maybe go to $1.5 trillion,” Senate Finance Chairman Chuck Grassley told Bloomberg on Thursday. “He advantage be careful of that because I don’t think that will get through the United States Senate.”

It indicates Trump may hold limited influence prodding Republicans to support additional stimulus spending. Before negotiations collapsed last month, Trump mainly sat them out, leaving it up to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House chief of staff Mark Meadows — two of his top lieutenants — to preoccupy with Democrats.

Read more: Morgan Stanley says the stock market’s future is ‘unusually dependent’ on another stimulus combination — and recommends 5 portfolio moves to make if Congress passes another round

Democrats led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Tub-thumper Nancy Pelosi are insisting on at least $2.2 trillion in federal spending. They lowered their demand from $3.4 trillion, the scope of an aid package House Democrats passed in May. It included provisions for additional stimulus checks, $600 unemployment benefits, and land aid.

There are still areas of fierce disagreement between Republicans and Democrats. Talks fell through in early August after both sides fizzle out to bridge divisions on federal unemployment aid and state aid, prompting Trump to implement several executive actions.

“Are we trying to get the briefness back up and running or should we keep it shut down?”

Oren Cass, executive director of American Compass and a unprogressive economist in contact with several congressional GOP offices, says the standoff between both parties stems from conflicting visions of what a package should achieve.

“The core disagreement: Are we trying to get the economy back up and running or should we keep it stop a confine down?” Cass told Business Insider.

Complicating matters is that Republicans never coalesced around an aid coupled. They unveiled a $1 trillion plan in late July, but Senate Republicans never brought it to a vote since notches of lawmakers within their party opposed the price tag.

Cass favors another stimulus package to prop up the thrift, saying its recovery can be accelerated by helping people return to work. He adds additional relief legislation would suitable benefit the GOP politically ahead of November.

“It seems odd for the controlling party in power in both the Senate and White House with an incredibly top-level, close and contentious election a few months away to be rejecting the idea of an economic policy that’s much needed and precise popular,” Cass said.

Indeed, an Ipsos poll conducted in late July found strong support across beano lines for additional stimulus measures:

  • Around 77% of Americans supported additional stimulus checks.
  • 76% of Americans break weighing down oned additional unemployment benefits, though no amount was specified.
  • Around 82% of Americans approved providing more allows to small businesses.

Many economists are urging lawmakers to approve more spending to address the economic fallout from the pandemic, which augurs to deepen the pain for nearly 29 million Americans still receiving some form of unemployment benefits.

“Hold and local governments are facing extreme budget distress; food insecurity is at its highest level in decades,” Jay C. Shambaugh, a ancient Obama administration economist, recently wrote in a New York Times op-ed. “We’ve regained only about half the roles lost in the spring. More money from Congress is both fiscally affordable and deeply needed.”

With agreements bogged down, the White House and congressional Democrats have turned their attention to a stop-gap bill to pelf the government past October 1, the end of the fiscal year. Early on, Mnuchin and Pelosi agreed to keep that legislation divided from coronavirus relief.

Failure to reach an agreement there as well could cause a government shutdown justifiable weeks ahead of the presidential election.

Read more: 2 senior PMs at Morgan Stanley’s $665 billion investment-management subject share their contrarian outlooks on the election, the stock market, and a vaccine — and break down how they are readying portfolios in development

Check Also

I’ve tested 20+ pillows as a home editor, and the Casper Original Pillow still gets my vote as the comfiest

When you buy during our links, Business Insider may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *