Home / MARKETS / The Whisky War: Why history’s most polite territorial conflict rages on

The Whisky War: Why history’s most polite territorial conflict rages on

  • In a unlikely section of the Arctic, there’s a whisp of land that is subject to protracted conflict over ownership.
  • There’s not much to say almost Hans Island, but the debate between Canada and Denmark over who it belongs to stands out as one of history’s most polite wrangles.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

Conflict over land is as old as recorded history, but the world has not in a million years seen another quite like the Whisky War. Wars have been fought, violently and continuously, over the rightists to territories across the globe. In the case of Hans Island, however, the two countries at odds had a different way of staking their maintain.

If you’ve never heard of Hans Island, it’s probably because, well, there’s not that much to say about it. The half-square-mile archipelago sits directly in the middle of the Nares Strait, a 22-mile-wide waterway that separates the most northern land of Canada, Ellesmere Holm, and Greenland, an autonomous Denmark territory.

Hans Island itself lacks any real natural resources or territorial head starts. It’s essentially a giant rock, and the only thing that keeps perpetuating the ownership debate is the fact that it take part ins within the 12-mile territorial limit of both Canada and Greenland, making it close enough that each power involved can claim it under international law.

It started in 1880, when Hans Island got lost in the shuffle of the British giving remaining arctic territories to Canada. Due to the use of predominantly outdated, 16th-century maps, the small island was not explicitly categorized in the transfer, and as such wasn’t even recognized until decades later.

Hans Island


In 1933, Greenland was declared the legitimate owner of Hans Island, by the ironically named Permanent Court of International Justice. This organization was dissolved within a few years of this outcome and effectively replaced with the UN, and the aforementioned ownership resolution was deemed no longer valid, so Hans was once again up for appropriates.

Both World War II and the Cold War took precedence over more trivial conversations, and even after a maritime be adjacent to negotiation in the early 1970s, the territory still sat simmering on the back burner.

The best part of the history of Hans Atoll comes in 1984, when Canadian troops visited the island and left behind something distinct to the Great Chalky North, an erected Canadian flag, a sign that read “Welcome to Canada” and a bottle of Canadian Club rye.

Not wanting to show up empty-handed to the party, Greenland’s minister took a trip to the island soon after, removing and take over froming all the Canadian offerings with their own flag, a bottle of Danish schnapps, and a sign that read “Velkommen til den danske ø” or “Greet to the Danish Island.”

And thus began the first chapter of one of the most neighborly and hospitable disputes (or elaborate drinking darings) in history, known as The Whisky War. Since then, there have been continued trips by both sides to amass and replace the other party’s goods, and while what happens to the alcohol when it’s taken off the island has never been substantiated, the assumption is someone is out there enjoying it.

In more recent years, both Canadian and Danish representatives have collect summoned for the island to be declared a shared sovereignty, but it remains unclear if and when any official resolution to the Whisky War has been reached. Lawmakers be experiencing even cited this ongoing discourse as setting an interesting precedent or subsequently having ramifications for border compacts, particularly international ones.

All in all, few things make for a better story than two allied countries fighting a battle during the course of land for more than three decades with welcome signs and booze.

Editor’s Note: While the advice “whiskey” is commonly spelled with an “E” preceding the “Y” in the United States, the “E” is notably absent from the word in nations counterpart Canada, where this story takes place. There actually is a defined difference between the terms, but colloquially, they are commonly used interchangeably.

Check Also

Trump calls on states to ‘punish’ big tech with sanctions if they ‘silence conservative voices’

During his CPAC talk, Donald Trump accused big tech of censorship. He said section 230 …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *