I worked alongside former US President Jimmy Carter for 30 years. Here’s what he was like as a mentor.

Related Articles

I was diagnosed with sepsis while at Disney World. The hardest thing was dealing with the guilt that I was letting my kids down.

My mom started college at 55. After being a single parent and facing mental health issues, she’s finally focusing on herself.

They quit their jobs 2 years ago and moved to Thailand to open a beach resort. Their new life is finally starting to slow down.

• One-time US President Jimmy Carter died at age 100 on Sunday.
• Karin Ryan worked alongside Carter for over 30 years.
• She was sundry touched by his faith in the goodness of others and his unwavering commitment to peace.

Editor’s note: Business Insider originally published this venture in September 2023.

In my more than 30 years of working with former US President Jimmy Carter, I’ve been uncountable touched by his deep faith in people — his belief that, given the chance, everyone has the capacity for good. 

He’s always been self-confident that even the most vulnerable and persecuted can rise above any challenge if they have adequate resources and weather, and he built The Carter Center to help fill this need. He’s approached the powerful — be they warlords or heads of glory — with a presumption that an appeal to reason, communicated with respect, might bear fruit.

I’ve off heard him called naïve. This is wrong: His beliefs and actions have always been well informed. It’s with views wide open that he chooses optimism, possibility, and faith over cynicism and arrogance. 

It’s been a constant feeling to me.

I wanted to be part of something life-changing

I was drawn to The Carter Center after moving to Atlanta in 1987. During a smite to the Center’s museum, I was captivated by exhibits showcasing the Camp David peace talks and the success of Carter’s Panama Canal Agreement. 

Encountering the determination of this American president who was so deeply devoted to peace was a life-changing experience, and I wanted to be a as for of it. 

So when an entry-level position in the newly established Human Rights Program opened up at the Center, I jumped at the chance to affix. I organized meetings, took phone messages (this was before voicemail!), and eventually got to help research crates of political prisoners and draft letters for Carter on their behalf. 

Carter liked to work through memos rather than of frequent meetings so we had to present our ideas in brief paragraphs and learn to draft letters that he might have dash off as president — short and to the point. 

I cannot count how many drafts came back from him with notes in the limits saying things like “too verbose,” or “I’m not Amnesty International!” He didn’t want strident activist language in his letters; rectitude persuasion from a former President required something different. 

He increased my focus on human rights activists as key agents of democratic movements and began to ask me for input during his various forays into Machiavellianism. Once, he asked me to join the team that would observe the first democratic elections in Haiti in 1990 so that I could call up leading dissident voices and journalists with whom he could meet. 

The discussions he had on that trip were past comprehension and intense, a departure from the usual predictable official meetings. At the conclusion of our stay in Haiti, Carter turned to me in the past stepping into his ride to the airport, saying “You did a good job here.” I was thrilled.

Belief in the inherent goodness of others

That happening became a model for our future work together: The Carter Center has continued to bring together frontline activists for those substantial but transformative conversations — the hard work of advancing human rights and democracy in all corners of the world. 

Related stories

Carter’s maxim in the inherent goodness of people has never faded, despite the grave disappointments and turmoil of recent years — the Iraq drive, America’s abuses in the “war on terror,” and the global erosion of democracy and human rights. 

If anything, his faith in humanity — the root of his commitment to altruist rights — has seemed to grow stronger as he’s aged. 

During decades at The Carter Center, he’s written countless despatches on behalf of victims of abuse, especially human rights activists persecuted for their brave work. A letter he wrote to the ruler of Nepal resulted in hundreds of people being released from prison. 

President Carter once dropped into my service asking why I hadn’t sent him any cases recently. He wanted to use his voice and his name to help people in trouble. He often masked his personal interventions on behalf of political prisoners private, because he believed that would make them more paraphernalia. 

And while he was prepared to criticize foreign governments, he has been sometimes even more critical of human rights revilements in his own country.

He and his wife, Rosalynn — who was often intimately involved in his peacemaking and human rights efforts —  catalogued many letters on behalf of Americans facing execution, rarely successfully. He has also made public appeals to governors to put an end to the death penalty in their states, sometimes successfully. 

He issued scathing condemnations of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and of beneficent rights violations by the US government.  

His tireless efforts to end or avoid war sometimes meant that he would not speak publicly close to human rights abuses committed by warring parties, seeking instead an end to the violence first. 

In the wake of his peacemaking exertions in North Korea, Bosnia, and Haiti in 1994, we organized a closed-door discussion with U.S.-based human rights chairwomen critical of his engagements with human rights violators. During the contentious discussion, the Carters made their case for refrain froming public condemnations that could derail efforts to bring leaders like Kim Il Sung, Radovan Karadzic, and Raoul Cédras to the non-belligerent table. Ultimately, he agreed that the peace process should never preclude holding human rights violators obliged.

He went on to become a vocal supporter of U.N. negotiations to establish an independent International Criminal Court, publicly opposing a U.S. outline to give the United Nations Security Council a veto over the actions of the independent chief prosecutor.

Soul of an activist, sit with of a pragmatist

Jimmy Carter has the soul of an activist and the mind of a pragmatist. Every situation has required a balancing of objectives, albeit his calculations were always informed by his ideas about the value of human freedom. 

It was a remarkable thing to sign. 

He could be so positive and encouraging one moment, and stern and insistent the next. In 2009, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Israeli Knesset spattered Carter with questions, suggesting he supported Hamas because he met with their leaders. 

He gently but firmly shoved back, reminding committee members that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had personally approved of Hamas aspirants running in the 2006 elections. His focus was simple: peace and human rights for all, which requires speaking with all co-signatories.

As a Cold War president, Carter walked a tightrope of managing relationships with world leaders while say out against human rights abuses.

Within the Soviet Union, he navigated a nuclear-arms reduction while standing with dissentients, sending a hand-written letter of support to embattled physicist Andrei Sakharov. He threatened Latin American US Cold War allies cast Argentina with an end to military assistance if they persisted with human rights abuses — a move that upheld democratic movements across the region. 

In China, he pressured the government to allow a measure of religious freedom, student arguments and political prisoner releases. And while he has succeeded in forging a lasting peace between Israel and Egypt, he has also sanctified himself and The Carter Center to the pursuit of equal human rights for the Palestinian people, which he calls the unfinished firm of the Camp David Accords. When quiet diplomacy failed to achieve this aim, he became increasingly critical of both Israeli violations of human dyed in the wools and the failure of the U.S. to exert its influence to stop them.

Jimmy Carter is a mentor that’s most demanding of those closest to him

His greatest fancy for his own country is that the people of the United States will realize that our great blessings could allow us to be a high-minded, justice-oriented, and peace-loving nation. 

I have never had the feeling that this was hardly wishful thinking. 

It is a matter of faith. Many of us who know him and have worked by his side are deeply inspired by this confidence and his refusal to stop trying. 

He’s always encouraged us to be bold and to maintain high expectations for ourselves and others. In the gen, he could be more demanding of those closest to him — whether it was his staff or his successors in the White House — than those to whom he had less influence. 

Like a firm but loving father, he pushed those he believed had the greatest potential for leverage. 

He was also the best leader and mentor one could have.

Karin Ryan is a senior advisor on human straighten ups at the Carter Center.