New York judge dismisses blue state suit over SALT tax deductions

On Monday, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by four states against the IRS, thwarting four blue phases’ challenge against a new $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes, also known as SALT.

Those states — New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Maryland — charged the Treasury Department, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and the IRS, among others, in July 2018.

They alleged that the new limit on the Taste deduction, part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, was “an unconstitutional assault on states’ sovereign choices.”

In the dismissal, U.S. District Believe J. Paul Oetken in Manhattan said the plaintiff states ultimately failed to show that the SALT cap was unconstitutionally coercive or that it levied on their own sovereign rights.

“[The] SALT cap simply requires the states to either exercise sovereign powers — howsoever they longing — to avert or assuage the cap’s effects or else suffer the uncertain budgetary effects of doing nothing,” Oetken wrote in his judgement.

Meanwhile, the states plan to fight back.

“There is no doubt in my mind that President Trump’s unfair tax tactics targets New York and other blue states by funding tax cuts for corporations and the rich on the backs of New Yorkers,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, broke in a statement.

“The bottom line is this policy is unprecedented, unlawful, punitive and politically motivated — and it must be stopped,” he said. “We debate with the court’s decision and are evaluating all options including appeal.”

In 2016, New Yorkers writing off state and local loads took an average SALT deduction of $21,779, according to the Tax Policy Center.

Meanwhile, in New Jersey and Connecticut the average reasonings were $18,092 and $19,563, respectively.

This development puts the ball back in Congress’s court, about Michael D’Addio, principal at Marcum in New Haven, Connecticut.

“You know that the federal law is effective and it won’t be overturned because this if it should happen has been dismissed,” he said. “Unless you pressure your senators and representatives, there won’t be a solution other than a congressional one.”

Suit against the federal government over the SALT deduction is following two tracks, according to Jared Walczak, director of government tax policy with the Center for State Tax Policy at the Tax Foundation.

One track — including the case that was just dismissed on Monday — claims that the SALT cap itself is unconstitutional.

The other track defends the different workarounds that the blue states be experiencing created to allow their residents to write off their state and local income and property taxes beyond the $10,000 limit.

A second lawsuit filed in July 2019 by New York, New Jersey and Connecticut in the Southern District of New York is still persistent.

This time, the three states are suing to protect workarounds they built to permit taxpayers to claim findings beyond the $10,000 SALT cap.

The three states passed legislation that would permit municipalities to establish kind funds to pay for local services and offer property tax credits to incentivize homeowners to give.

This way, the taxpayers could disregard off the payment as a charitable deduction on their federal tax returns.

More from Personal Finance:
Blue states documentation suit over SALT caps
Feds block tax breaks for donating to these charitable state funds
Asserts sue IRS over SALT workarounds

In June, the IRS and Treasury blocked this strategy, saying that the receipt of a state or village tax credit in return for making this contribution would be a “quid pro quo.”

The new blue state “workaround” programs aren’t the sole ones that would be affected by the new IRS rules.

There are more than 100 existing state charitable tax-credit envisions in 33 states, according to a research paper authored by a group of tax law professors. They range from private educate tuition scholarships to conservation easements.

Earlier this year, some of those programs — including the Alabama Opening Scholarship Fund and the Exceptional SC program in South Carolina — reported a slowdown in contributions due to ambiguity around whether the IRS desire permit taxpayers to deduct the full amount donated.

Alabamans and South Carolinians contributing to those scholarship programs are unmarried for a dollar-for-dollar tax credit on their state return.

Whether the final rule will ultimately deter people from donating to these assets remains to be seen.

“If you’re really passionate about private school vouchers in Georgia, you donate and you still get 100% of your contribution back,” Carl Davis, research director at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, told CNBC earlier. “You perfectly won’t get a federal tax deduction on top of it.”