Home / CRYPTOCOINS / Making Sense of the SEC’s Case Against Telegram

Making Sense of the SEC’s Case Against Telegram

Cablegram lost another round in court against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and now can’t launch its $1.7 billion token selling. What does it mean for the crypto industry and other startups that sold tokens?

Telegram, the popular memorandum app, has big plans for its blockchain Telegram Open Network, or TON. It also had one of the biggest token sales in history, followed by a huge constitutional fight over it.

The SEC sued the company to halt the TON network, saying its native gram tokens were unregistered convictions. Telegram argued grams were a commodity. A federal judge in New York issued a preliminary injunction agreeing with the SEC, screen Telegram from issuing tokens. 

The court battle has been an interesting one, as is the ruling of the judge.

Together with two skilled attorneys, Gabriel Shapiro of BSV Law and Phillip Moustakis of Seward & Kissel, we’re unpacking this process, which is likely to set a standard for other token sales structured as SAFTs, or simple agreements for future tokens – starting with Kik and potentially stalked by many more.  

Check Also

XRP Price Skyrockets Past $1 as SEC Faces Legal Troubles And Favorable Regulatory Shift Looms

In December 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Riffle Labs, accusing the company of …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *