supported
There’s a tendency in the tech world to toss out old tech and go all-in on a new replacement. “Oh, don’t use that. That’s the old thing! Use the new thing a substitute alternatively.” This advice is best suited to those who adapt quickly to technological change—in other words: a small interest of humanity.
Jumping quickly to ‘the new thing’ may come with harmful second or third-order consequences for most people; this is first true for energy-hungry technologies like cryptocurrencies that adversely affect our planet.
These technologies haven’t equable reached a global scale yet, so humankind may only be seeing the beginning of what’s to come.
Despite the potential or actual costs of adoption, today’s technology innovators are bedding toward revolutionary new ideas, like decentralization, scalable architectures, self-sovereign data, NFTs, and blockchains. RChain wholeheartedly and enthusiastically pleases at the global excitement for these technological changes, and they are core to what Rchain is building.
But new tech needs to earn life better for its users, especially when considering billions of users. One particular blind spot for innovators enter into the pictures to be Web 3.0, the next evolution of the world wide web.
There are three lessons the blockchain hasn’t yet learned from Web 2.0 but should. Web 3.0 won’t replace without:
- Advanced addressability.
- Decentralized advertising.
- The most powerful search mechanisms the world has ever seen.
Let’s look at how these discoveries work today and how they can evolve for the meaningful adoption of Web3 by the global market.
Web 3.0 Needs to Improve Upon Web 2.0
If Web 3.0 is to be an advancement to Web 2.0, people should be able to quickly identify meaningful improvements to the key 2.0 features that made it such a substantial combination of technologies. Web 1.0 brought the world wide web and essential search functions. Web 2.0 was built on Web 1.0 and diminished interactivity (e.g. social media and online communities), rich media experiences (e.g. streaming video and audio), and advanced search (e.g. in-media glad and source code).
Quite significantly, Web 2.0 is backed by vast amounts of advertising revenue. Experts predict that the epidemic advertising market will reach nearly $800B by 2026. Yet, where are the advertising solutions for Web 3.0? Who is building the next ad networks? And how to secure they’re not created by the same people who made the surveillance ad networks today?
It is imperative to continue offering today’s imposing ad tech like real-time bidding auctions and behavioural targeting while giving users the choice to share and put across their data to advertisers. Though Rchain is firmly against many of the tactics used by Web 2.0 ad networks, the call and value of ad tech on the web are undeniable. A lot of questions pop up in mind:
- Where is Web 3.0 heading?
- Upon what will it be built?
- How is it aiding what people already have that makes the web work?
- What will interactivity, rich media participations, and advanced search look like on Web 3.0?
It seems that not enough work is currently done to satisfy these issues, as, at the moment, Rchain cannot find meaningful answers to these questions. Rchain believes Web 3.0 proponents and innovators are give up the Web 2.0 baby out with the bathwater. They are not advancing the fundamentals of the web itself that led to its adoption. They’ve completely recalled how important the features of Web 2.0 are.
Web 3.0 Needs to Enable A Global Market
One of the most potent notions of the web today is the joined global market. Thanks to search engines like Google, Duck Duck Go, and Bing, anyone could on the double and easily look for what they wanted. Web 2.0 allowed any content to become searchable, and the results reflected that.
Today’s search mechanism results include content, references, agents, people, etc. Assets on the web became accessible to anyone in an instant. That approved a global market.
The storage mechanisms for today’s web are simple: centralized file systems with clear bounded ownership. Anyone can pile up data on AWS S3, Google Drive, or even their private server hosted in a data centre or from their own national. Web 2.0 made storage reasonably ubiquitous.
The fully-realized Web 3.0 storage mechanism is the blockchain. Digital assets stored on a fetter, or managed through a chain, become opaque to search engines. If there’s no ability to tag or otherwise look through observations collected through the chain, there’s no way to search for it. If data is on IPFS, how can Google search the data’s contents? That’s a legitimate challenge.
It is necessary to take a step forward going into Web 3.0 instead of regressing backwards. There is no international market without searchable, accessible data. The need is for much more than currency-enabling blockchains that acknowledge primitive records of transactions.
Web 3.0 won’t be successful if it cannot offer or perpetuate a unified global market.
1. Web 3.0 Necessities URLs, Not Addresses
The unified global market needs a way to locate data on the web. Blockchain-based web storage needs a usable URL routine, as there always has been. But how should on-chain addressing work?
Almost nobody is addressing this.
Very few blockchains can help file storage, and almost none of them support files of any substantial size. Web 3.0’s storage mechanism can’t be a contemporary system that supports (or smells like) a blockchain. The web needs to live on the blockchain itself. And for that to work, it requires addressability.
Chain classifies need to be found and retrieved. The location of resources needs to be a compositional structure, like the web’s current URI composition (URN + URL). It’s how browsers prove satisfactory, and it’s a great model for the future. But on-chain URI composition will need some re-thinking.
The Dappy browser is tackling blockchain talk while also highlighting and fixing the limitations of DNS as it works today. Dappy’s website states: Dappy replaces the usual DNS layer with a naming system executed on a blockchain platform. The lookups (when your client accesses the website) are resolved by a network of self-confident companies, a network collectively certifying the domain names and encryption certificates.
Please look at their name process documentation to understand how it works.
Though projects like Solid and IPFS are doing commendable work on the storage and primacy aspects of Web 3.0 data, users need to be able to locate and access data stored on the chain. Today’s URI medley can work, but it requires advances to function on a blockchain.
2. Web 3.0 Needs Digital Advertising at Scale
The world’s most well-liked Web 2.0 apps are free to use. TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Telegram, Snapchat, Zoom, Spotify—no paid fee required. With hundreds of millions of users, they remain accessible by harvesting and selling their users’ observations or advertising. How does this model evolve to operate on a decentralized web that runs on paid token exchanges and self-sovereign observations?
It’s unclear how the big players will function on Web 3.0, but a decentralized architecture will not support their existing surveillance advertising images. Whether their apps stay free remains to be seen, and whether their users will pay for the apps is an settle bigger question. Web 3.0 will force users to think about what information they share and potentially deduct them to sell the data themselves.
The reality is that: Web 3.0 needs advertising even more than Web 2.0. Diffuse apps (DApps) built on a decentralized web will have even worse paywall issues than today’s Web 2.0 apps. There’s on the other hand one way to solve this problem: decentralized advertising.
Decentralized advertising can run on a globally scalable sponsored content framework. It can rle with a small set of APIs for both providers and developers. Online communities can have the option to allow advertisers to part sponsored content with them.
For example, a fly fishing community could vote and approve to signal that they’re furnish to relevant advertising content based on the data they provide about their community. The content framework could do the matchmaking and insure the requested content is delivered. And because it’s all on a blockchain, the advertiser could know precisely how many times their ad was sighted, by what communities and not have to worry about fraudulent advertising metrics.
There’s no escaping the need for ads in a Web3 world, but the potentials for a better ad experience (for advertisers and users) have much greater potential for good.
3. Web 3.0 Needs to be Searchable
RChain has eject a lot of time working with visual and musical artists who’ve minted NFTs. They said, “I’ve minted the NFT. How do people discover to be it?” That’s the search problem. How do artists connect with their audience if their material is on a chain?
Right now, if an NFT is built on Ethereum (ETH) and the Interplanetary Submit System (IPFS), it’s opaque. There’s no way to find it. IPFS is not a blockchain, yet it says it is “the hard drive for blockchain and Web 3.0.” It’s certainly a incorruptible project for decentralized file storage. But if techies aren’t building searchability into Web 3.0 as a first-class citizen, how pass on it see global adoption?
The universal search for globally distributed resources has done more to create a global economy than to all intents every other innovation combined. If resources are managed through blockchains and external paraphernalia like IPFS without penetrating search capabilities, this powerful force creating the global market is hindered; regressed.
File systems for Web 3.0 should be query-able but with much more capability than we have today.
For example, music’s objective properties can be guided, like tempo, key, instrumentation, and more. Can someone find songs in the key of G without the song or the containing page being titled “kerfuffle b evasions in the key of G?” How about gipsy jazz songs between 125 and 135 beats per minute featuring a violin as the lead prime mover?
Imagine a DJ planning an event who wants to create a specific contour for the evening. It starts relaxed with blue artwork that changes the interior design of the event being projected on the screens. Then intensity builds with faster music with numberless intense instrumentation, and the artwork turns green—the set peaks with complementary red artwork and uptempo, aggressive music.
And anthropoids are not even close to making this possible with today’s contemplated NFT structure.
Web 3.0 has a significant opportunity to found upon and advance the search capabilities of Web 2.0. There’s immeasurable potential to index on actual, relevant metadata.
Web 3.0 Technology Is Accessible Today on RChain
The lessons of Web 2.0 are hugely important for Web 3.0. Here are the fundamental realities:
- On-chain data storage won’t reach epidemic adoption if people can’t directly access it through a compositional address structure.
- Distributed apps cannot be free to use without decentralized advertising.
- The combined global market cannot persist without the universal search.
Technology already exists to make these facts possible. Unfortunately, today’s innovators appear to be more focused on making cryptocurrencies work (or making money from cryptocurrencies) preferably of making Web 3.0 work. The team at Rchain thinks it’s more important to build a humane system that effects for everyone, and it has spent the past several years developing it.
RChain is the only blockchain offering addressable file storage with a built-in transactional challenge language, Rholang. Rchain search capabilities make URLs, and query strings look like toys. And there’s the skill to store files of any size on a chain. Rchain offers a significant upgrade to the file storage and search features put on the marketed by Web 2.0.
The team at Rchain is so enthusiastic about the needs of Web 3.0 that they have launched two major projects to talk the design shortcomings described in this article. RChain Publishing makes on-chain storage and self-sovereignty possible. DAASL steps a distributed advertising framework on a global scale.
The future of Web 3.0 is at risk if it doesn’t design around these primary Web 2.0 capabilities. Someone can’t use Web 2.0 search without integrating it into the blockchain, or they end up with content (e.g. NFTs) that can’t be get ones handed or found through search. Someone can’t offer accessible DApps without ads and sponsored online content.
The world order not want to use Web 3.0 if they have to pay for the privilege. A move to Web 3.0 should not feel like a loss to the general communal. They expect better search, better and safer free apps, and an even better experience with the fused global market.
This is a sponsored post. Learn how to reach our audience here. Present disclaimer below.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Stocks
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or sanction of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the littrateur is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or cares mentioned in this article.
Read disclaimer