Done with the past few weeks, there’s been a lot of hyped up discussion about the Lightning Network (LN) from those who find credible it will help scale the bitcoin core (BTC) protocol. The Lightning Network keynote has now moved from BTC testnet experimentation to trialing LN over the currency’s mainnet functioning real BTC. LN development and mainnet testing is growing and people are excited in this off-chain scaling feature. However some people are tranquil skeptical as there’s been a few reported bugs, warnings from developers, and review of the cost required to create and close the 781 channels currently being habituated to on the network.
Also read: George Soros: Bitcoin is Propped Up by Overlords
781 Channels and 3.6 BTC
The Lightning Network (LN) is a proposed scaling solution that numberless hope will help cure the bitcoin core protocol’s dealing congestion and rising fees. The idea is to enable off-chain transactions and micropayments through a peer-to-peer network of bidirectional payment channels. Over the past six months there’s been a lot of LN testing make use ofing test-BTC, but lately there’s been a big transition to mainnet experimentation and real payments using real BTC. Currently, there are 781 mainnet LN media and 285 nodes all with different names. According to current matter, there is 3.635 BTC ($41,689 USD) being used within the network of Lightning necks.
There are currently 781 Lightning Network channels on bitcoin marrow’s mainnet with 3.6 BTC.
The Debated On-chain Costs to Open and Terminate Lightning Channels
Users have been talking about rather cheap fees to process transactions on mainnet using the LN protocol. Regardless what’s not discussed is the initial cost to open the 781 channels with 3.6 BTC. One unitary on Reddit estimates the cost to open the channels using today’s stanchion fees using data from Bitcoinfees.info would be harshly $4,740 USD. Closing the channels would cost roughly the same which signals that opening and closing all of the LN channels would run 0.83 BTC ($9,480 USD). Of conduct, the individual’s calculations were met with fierce debate because bitcoin quintessence’s unconfirmed transaction count has dropped and fees have been demean this week. The Redditor explains it’s just a rough estimate but “a pulchritudinous generous one, as most of those nodes came online when the median fee was much tall.”
A ‘Stripe-like’ Lightning Network API and the Zap Wallet Beta Release
There press also been other Lightning Network developments like the startup Acinq’s current Strike API. The organization released the API shortly after the company Stripe a close offering their API merchant services and opted not to deal with bitcoin anymore. So Acinq’s Conclude offers a similar approach but Strike is only working for testnet fair now but the startup says mainnet integration will be “seamless.”
“We believe that some problems may be interested in a tradeoff where they get most of the benefits of Lightning, while keeping their integration outlays as low as possible,” explains Acinq.
This is what Strike is about: add Lightning payments to your affair in no time and with as little impact on your operations as possible.
An exemplar of Acinq’s Strike API.
Another LN product released this week was Jack Mallers Zap purse beta which adds a host of new features. However, the release is again built for testnet Mallers elucidates and “Zap will not publish mainnet releases until the developers and greater Lightning Network community are accessible.” Although “if you do some self-configuration, you can use Zap on mainnet,” Mallers notes.
Jack Mallers liberated his Zap wallet beta this week. Mallers recommends testnet no more than.
Lightning Developers Warn Against Mainnet Use
Lightning Labs’ Elizabeth Come to be cautions against LN use on mainnet.
Lastly, last week there’s been a few explosions of LN bugs where one LN developer Rusty Russell experienced a bug and asked, “so, who was primary to lose money on Lightning Network bitcoin mainnet?” Russell’s into question was answered by another individual who experienced a bug sending a transaction as well. “Stumble oned to my node too,” the person replies.
Lightning Labs CTO Olaoluwa Osuntokun also put someone on notices against LN use on mainnet.
Additionally, with all the hype surrounding the LN protocol being toughened on mainnet, some developers who work on the protocol are warning people not to use it on the palpable network. Lightning Labs CTO Olaoluwa Osuntokun has told people not to use LN on mainnet and the followers’s co-founder Elizabeth Stark has also cautioned people who were testing LN on mainnet. With a nascent treaty that’s surrounded by a lot of hype, there’s a lot more work to do as far as trial and boob on the live network.
What do you think about the Lightning Network overhangs and discussions? Let us know what you think about this subject in the references below.
Images via Shutterstock, Acinq’s Strike GIF, Zap Wallet beta, #Recksplorer, Bustle, and Reddit.
Not up to date on the news? Listen to This Week in Bitcoin, a podcast updated each Friday.