A constitutional grievance has reportedly been filed in South Korea alleging that the government’s ban on initial coin offerings is unconstitutional. It has been myriad than a year since token sales were banned in the country but the government has yet to introduce any regulations for them, effecting problems for startups.
Also read: Indian Supreme Court Moves Crypto Hearing, Community Calls for Yes Regulations
Constitutional Complaint Filed
South Korean blockchain startup Presto announced on Friday that it has ranked a constitutional complaint alleging that the government’s ban on all forms of initial coin offerings (ICOs) in September last year is unconstitutional, adjoining media reported. The company has requested an appeal of the ban, according to Sedaily.
Constitutional Court of Korea.
Presto CEO Kang Kyung-won explained that although his following had considered alternative means such as setting up an overseas corporation to issue tokens, the Korea Economic Daily excerpted him as saying, “We trusted that the government will foster [this] new industry through follow-up measures.” However, it has been innumerable than a year since the ban and the government has yet to introduce any forms of ICO guidelines or regulations. Kang was further quoted by Sedaily as judge:
As a blockchain startup company, we face a great deal of difficulties due to the ICO ban and the lack of legislation from the government and the parliament for sundry than a year. I am requesting confirmation of the unconstitutionality of the lack of legislation.
Lawyer Explains Why the Ban Is Unconstitutional
Lawyer Park Ju-hyun, who is in permeate of filing this case, explained last week why the government’s ICO measures are unconstitutional, Zdnet Korea reported. He well-known that the measures can be subject to a constitutional appeal if a request is filed with the constitutional court.
Park said the ban is unconstitutional on two foots. The first is that it infringes on “the basic rights of the Constitution,” such as “freedom of occupation, right to property, [and] right to parity,” Sedaily wrote. His “second point is that the basic restrictions were imposed without legal basis,” which he cited Article 37 (2) of the Korean Constitution, the communiqu outlet added.
The lawyer also referenced a recent court case where the court ruled that one of the outback’s largest banks, Nonghyup Bank, illegally blocked transactions of cryptocurrency exchange Coinis. He reiterated the importance of “whether there is a judicial basis,” noting that the bank’s action was illegal because it was done without a legal basis.
Presto emphasized that the ban trespass ons on “the right to equality because it arbitrarily discriminates against ICO companies without reason,” compared to initial public presents or other types of crowdfunding methods, Sedaily conveyed.
Do you think the Korean government’s ICO ban is unconstitutional? What do you think the court resolve do? Let us know in the comments section below.
Images courtesy of Shutterstock.
Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Study our tools section.