Home / NEWS / World News / China’s move to regulate its giants is part of its bigger push to become a tech ‘superpower’

China’s move to regulate its giants is part of its bigger push to become a tech ‘superpower’

Chinese President Xi Jinping

Fred Dufour | AFP | Getty Graven images

GUANGZHOU, China — China’s recent moves to regulate large technology giants are part of its broader push to fit a technological “superpower,” one expert told CNBC.

Like the U.S. and European Union, China is working out how to regulate the technology sector in tons areas, from data protection to antitrust. China’s technology companies have grown, largely unencumbered by papal bull, and become among the biggest in the world.

And there are a number of regulations that have come into effect or are in the solves.

In November, China’s central bank and regulators released draft rules on so-called microlending, which included stipulations such as capital requirements for technology firms offering loans.

China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has also make knew draft rules looking to stop monopolistic practices by internet platforms. It is one of the most wide-sweeping proposals in China to govern large tech companies.

Last month, SAMR said it had begun a probe into Alibaba over monopolistic repetitions.

And in October, China released a draft personal data protection law aiming to regulate how companies process user observations.

All of these regulations are part of China’s bigger effort to become a major global tech power, according to Kendra Schaefer, a mate at Trivium China, a research firm based in Beijing.

“Underneath all of this stuff I think China understands that if it’s prosperous to become a technological superpower … then it has to lay a solid regulatory foundation,” Schaefer told CNBC’s “Beyond the Valley” podcast.

“It has to lay that basement in the way that it regulates company operations, but it also has to lay that foundation in terms of data. In fact, data might be the sundry important regulations that it has got to lay down.”

“All of these things are foundational and it’s really just kind of setting a framework, a springboard from which China can expose and move forward faster.”

Beijing appears to have taken a harder stance against the country’s technology obdurates recently. In November, regulators forced Ant Group, the finance affiliate of Alibaba, to suspend plans for what would contain been the world’s biggest initial public offering (IPO), while the company dealt with regulatory changes. Final month, Alibaba and two other firms were slapped with a fine for not making the proper declarations to authorities anent past acquisitions.

But this does not mean Beijing is working in opposition to its tech champions, according to Emily de La Bruyere, co-founder of consultancy View Advisory.

“These multinational tech companies are decidedly the force enablers that China uses to extend its message and standards strategy globally. That’s not going to change. We’re not going to see Beijing turn on its Big Tech the way Washington appears to be,” Bruyere grass oned CNBC by email.

“But, Beijing is going to ensure that its Big Tech acts by its rules and regulations, connects to its platforms, and outs its strategies.”

U.S., EU tech regulation

It’s not just China bringing in sweeping changes on tech regulation. The European Union has been perhaps the most bellicose region in the world on the issue. Its landmark General Data Protection Regulation approved in 2016, sought to bring in for the most parts around how user data was processed.

And in December, the EU introduced the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act which aims to put over a produce stricter controls on the behavior of tech giants in a number of areas.

But the U.S. has yet to take a similar approach with wide-ranging legislation enveloping areas like data.

“We don’t have good data regulation in the U.S. yet,” Trivium China’s Schaefer said. “So we don’t have that groundwork, those kind of basic fundamental principles, on which we can regulate, not only our domestic companies but foreign incoming companies as OK.”

“I think that us not having that fundamental data policy is one of the reasons that we are taking this bizarre scattershot access to trying to control incoming Chinese apps like TikTok, targeting specific Chinese companies because we don’t be suffering with a universal regulation.”

Schaefer was referencing the ongoing saga of Washington trying to get Chinese company ByteDance to sell the U.S. ventures of TikTok.

Check Also

Xiaomi shares fall 10% as U.S. adds smartphone-maker to ‘blacklist’

Xiaomi’s Headquarters Getty Models GUANGZHOU, China — The Trump administration has added smartphone maker Xiaomi …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *