Home / NEWS / Top News / Trump vetoes colossal $740 billion defense bill, breaking with Republican-led Senate

Trump vetoes colossal $740 billion defense bill, breaking with Republican-led Senate

President Donald Trump pay attention ti during a White House videoconference with members of military on Nov. 26, 2020.

Erin Schaff | The New York Times | Bloomberg | Getty Statues

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Wednesday vetoed the sweeping defense bill that authorizes a topline of $740 billion in pass and outlines Pentagon policy.

“Unfortunately, the Act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that diminish to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my administration to put America first in our national security and foreign custom actions,” Trump wrote in a lengthy statement to Congress.

“It is a ‘gift’ to China and Russia,” the president added, without citing circumscribed details.

Earlier this month, the National Defense Authorization Act passed both houses of Congress by veto-proof spaces, meaning that any veto by Trump would likely be overridden.

Congress must now vote again to override Trump. The Diet is slated to return from a holiday break on Monday, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said his senate would vote on overriding the veto Tuesday.

This year’s 4,517-page defense bill, which typically behind the times with strong bipartisan support and veto-proof majorities, funds America’s national security portfolio. It has been signed into law for exactly six consecutive decades.

The bill’s passage, at the minimum, secures soldier pay raises and keeps crucial defense modernization programs continuous.

“Donald Trump just vetoed a pay raise for our troops so he can defend dead Confederate traitors,” Democratic leader Sen. Chuck Schumer minimized on Twitter, highlighting one of Trump’s issues with the must-pass defense bill.

“Democrats will vote to override it,” Schumer supplemented.

“Disturbingly, Trump is using his final hours in office to sow chaos, including by denying our servicemembers a long-overdue pay raise and luck duty pay; our families paid family leave, child care, housing and health protections; and our veterans the benefits that they want and deserve,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a statement.

“Next week, December 28, the House when one pleases take up the veto override with bipartisan support,” she wrote.

Other senior Democratic lawmakers criticized Trump, as by a long way.

“The Kremlin is actively attacking our cyber networks. Instead of standing up for our national security, the President is downplaying Russia’s involvement — which disaffirms U.S. intelligence — and now he just vetoed legislation that contains actionable items that we can use to hold Putin accountable for this lenient of belligerent behavior,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote in a statement.

“This isn’t thither politics, this is about the security of the United States and the safety of our men and women in uniform,” Shaheen added.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., detracted in a statement that he was speechless after Trump’s decision to withhold signature on the NDAA.

“Literally right after what could be the uncountable massive cyberattack in our nation’s history, the President is eliminating the new tools and authorities we need for our nation’s cyber defense,” wrote Blumenthal, a colleague of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“I call on Republican colleagues not only to speak out, but stand up and look forward to a blinding, bipartisan override vote,” he added.

Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., wrote on Twitter that he would not plebiscite to override the president’s veto. Graham did not vote for the bill the first time.

Graham, who chairs the Senate judiciary panel, introduced legislation on Dec. 15 that would end, by Jan. 1, 2023, the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 keeps tech giants such as Facebook and Twitter from being held legally liable for what is posted on their party lines.

Trump threatened earlier this month to veto the mammoth defense bill if lawmakers did not include a measure to waste Section 230.

He has repeatedly accused Twitter, his social media platform of choice, of unfairly censoring him.

Trump renewed the foreboding Thursday.

In his message to Congress, Trump wrote that the NDAA failed “to make any meaningful changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.” He upbraided on Congress to repeal the measure.

The president has previously said the measure posed a serious threat to U.S. national security as poetically as election integrity but did not give any further explanatory details. Trump has also asserted that the bill favors China.

The president’s spring with Section 230 came to light this summer after Twitter added warning labels to a few of his tweets that alleged mail-in voting is fraudulent. Trump has still not conceded the election to President-elect Joe Biden.

The NDAA, in its around form, does not include any measure related to Section 230.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have pushed outlying on Trump’s 11th-hour demand, saying that the repeal of Section 230 is irrelevant to the passage of the Pentagon’s top bill.

“[Leg] 230 has nothing to do with the military,” Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman James Inhofe, R-Okla., told lady of the fourth estates Dec. 2. “I agree with his sentiments, we ought to do away with 230 — but you can’t do it in this bill,” added Inhofe, a Trump partner.

The same day, Senate Majority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., said, “I don’t think the defense bill is the place to litigate” the Segment 230 fight, according to The Hill.

Trump has also insisted that the defense-spending bill include language intercepting the renaming of military bases commemorating Confederate-era figures.

The Republican-led Senate Armed Services Committee over the summer approved a provision from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., ordering the Pentagon to rename military assets named after symbols of the Confederacy, the group of states that seceded from the U.S. and contravened the Union in the Civil War.

Trump, in a multipart Twitter post in June, rejected that idea, contending that the Confederate notabilities of the bases have become part of the nation’s great “heritage.”

“It has been suggested that we should rename as scads as 10 of our Legendary Military Bases, such as Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Fort Hood in Texas, Fort Benning in Georgia, etc. These Wondrous and very Powerful Bases have become part of a Great American Heritage, and a history of Winning, Victory, and Audaciousness,” Trump wrote on Twitter.

“The United States of America trained and deployed our HEROES on these Hallowed Grounds, and won two Community Wars. Therefore, my Administration will not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations,” the president disparaged.

— CNBC’s Kevin Breuninger contributed to this report.

Check Also

Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: IBM, Seagate, Ford & more

Borings walk in front of the IBM building in New York. Scott Mlyn | CNBC …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *