Home / NEWS / Top News / Oil prices could go much higher if there is a military escalation after Saudi attack

Oil prices could go much higher if there is a military escalation after Saudi attack

An staff member walks past crude oil storage tanks at the Juaymah Tank Farm in Saudi Aramco’s Ras Tanura oil refinery and oil connector in Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia, on Monday, Oct. 1, 2018.

Simon Dawson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The growth of the U.S. as both oil producer and exporter is help cap a spike in crude prices following attacks on Saudi Arabian oil facilities, but the price could go sharply higher, depending on the duration of the disruption and whether it escalates into a military be incompatible.

The weekend attack on Saudi Aramco’s Abqaiq processing facility and another plant knocked 5.7 million barrels of Saudi making off line and underscores a new realization of vulnerability in world oil production. That is 5% of global oil output and about half of Saudi’s film, but Saudi Arabia has sufficient supplies to maintain its current export level for about a month.

Oil prices initially blocked nearly 20% in trading Sunday evening but were up just about 14.5% in U.S. trading Monday, the biggest one-day budge since February 2016. Brent was trading at $68.45 per barrel in late trading.

“What the market is pricing is geopolitical endanger premium and tail risk. Something like this has never happened before. There have been take a crack ats, but those were foiled,” said Amarpreet Singh, Barclays energy analyst. “Something like this to Saudi distribute has absolutely never happened, even during the Gulf War.”

Houthi rebels, aligned with Iran, claimed obligation for the attack, but Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Iran was responsible.

Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry swayed an investigation into the incident shows Iranian weapons were used in the attack. President Donald Trump chaired over a national security meeting at the White House Monday morning on the topic of Iran, NBC News reported from informants.

Trump told reporters Monday afternoon that he was in no rush to respond to the attacks on Saudi oil facilities. He also ventured “it was a very big attack” that could be met with a much larger attack.

Trump said Pompeo is going to Saudi Arabia, and the U.S. has been in hold a candle to with European countries including France, which is still a party to the nuclear agreement with Iran.

“The multitudinous we have coming from Washington and Riyadh implicating the Iranians in this attack, there may be more pressure for Washington to promote words with action,” said Helima Croft, head of global commodities research. “This is one of the most strategically prominent energy facilities in the world. If you do nothing, are you essentially greenlighting more attacks? At what point do you need to show some deterrence?”

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani intended, at a press briefing Monday, that the attack was self-defense by Houthis and a retaliatory response for Saudi attacks on Yemen.

The pounce upon on Aramco facilities was highly sophisticated and targeted the critical processing plants that help reduce hydrogen sulfur in offensive. There have been numerous other attacks on Saudi Arabia, as well as on oil tankers, but none has done such considerable damage.

Analysts at Goldman Sachs said a lengthier outage could result in a sharp jump in crude cost outs. For instance, if the current level of production remained down for more than six weeks, there could be a quick muster in Brent to $75 per barrel, they said in a note. Brent is the international benchmark and traditionally has been more susceptive to events in the Middle East.

Singh said Brent could reach $75 if the outage is extended, and in about three weeks the Saudi oil stockings would begin to run low. “If it takes that long you’ll really start seeing another leg up,” he said.

The Barclays analyst bruit about the market has been responding to the worries of slowing economic activity from the trade war, and he said the market was already diverting toward a deficit.

“What’s incremental [for oil prices] is this attack, and what’s unknown is how long it’s going to take to put production. The other unknown is what kind of escalation is going to happen here,” he said.

But oil could go even acute, depending on whether there are further attacks or a military response from Saudi Arabia, the U.S. or others. “If this escalates into a hot war, you’re looking on a $100 oil,” thought John Kilduff of Again Capital.

He noted that Saudi Arabia is calling on the United Nations to investigate the denounces.

“You don’t get the sense there’s a rush to war, as spectacular as this attack was,” said Kilduff.

For now, both U.S. West Texas Intermediate and Brent days are trading at levels last seen in May and have broken slightly above a range they were trapped in all summer. WTI time to comes settled up 14.8% at $62.90 per barrel, its best day since December 2008.

Croft said Brent could get back to this year’s stiff of $75.60, and in the event of an escalation, it could reach its October 2018 high of $86.74 per barrel. “$85 is the new $100,” predicted Croft. “What’s changed is you now have this resource in the U.S.”

A conflict in the Middle East could have driven oil to $200 a barrel five years ago. “If you add a war to this, perchance you would have $100,” she said.

The pressure is also on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to take motion. The crown prince is in charge of Saudi Arabia’s military and leads the war in Yemen. He also is driving the kingdom’s diversification attainment away from oil. The anticipated initial public offering of Aramco is a big part of that effort, though some analysts suggested it may now be delayed.

“If they don’t do anything, they’re going to look really weak,” said Kilduff.

Croft, in an earlier note, said the culminate prince has shown more willingness to confront the Iranians and their proxies than previous Saudi leaders.

“At a nominal, we would expect to see stepped-up Saudi bombings on Houthi targets in Yemen, but one cannot rule out a more direct retaliation on Iran if the denounces continue at the current pace,” she noted.

The U.S. said it would consider tapping its strategic oil reserves to make up for lost provision, but U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry said it would be premature to do so at this point.

Analysts have already been gravid the U.S. to add more export capacity. Pipelines to take crude from the Permian basin to the Gulf Coast have scarcely come on line, and more are to follow.

According to Citigroup, the new pipelines could help grow U.S. oil exports from the latest 3 million barrels a day by 1 million barrels more by year-end and another million barrels next year. Exports obtain already grown by an average 970,00 barrels a day this year over last year, according to Citigroup.

The U.S. is currently importing altogether little Saudi oil, and imports now are about 500,000 barrels a day.

“There’s actually a silver lining, if you will, to this tale in the sense that had this happened five years ago, it could have absolutely brought the global economy to its knees. Today, we’re disturbed about it. We need to address it, but it’s not anywhere near as devastating as it would have been five years ago,” Energy Secretary Rick Perry mentioned CNBC.

According to Energy Department weekly data, the U.S. produced about 12.4 million barrels a day and exported forth 3.3 million barrels a day earlier this month. The U.S. was a net importer of about 3.4 million barrels of crude.

The U.S. in the old times year has become the world’s largest oil producer, ahead of both Saudi Arabia and Russia. OPEC and Russia drink had an agreement to reduce production in an attempt to prop up world oil prices, which have been soft on worries around weakening demand growth.

Check Also

New York postpones Democratic primary amid coronavirus outbreak, the 11th state to do so

Voters designate ballots at an Upper East City polling station in New York City on …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *