Uber gutted fresh allegations on Tuesday that it deliberately took steps to feed “unlawful schemes from seeing the light of day.”
Hours of testimony on Tuesday centered everywhere a letter from a former Uber security analyst’s attorney to an Uber Queens. The former analyst, Richard Jacobs testified that there was a directive for Uber wage-earners to use disappearing chat apps like Wickr. In his letter, Jacobs demanded that Uber sent employees to Pittsburgh (where it’s developing its autonomous instruments) to “educate” them on how to prevent “Uber’s unlawful schemes from receiving the light of day.”
He reportedly made other bombshell allegations in the letter, embracing that employees at Uber were trained to “impede” ongoing inquests, multiple media outlets reported.
Tweet: Ex-Uber employee: Uber had “non-attributable apparatus” for communciations with vendors and others so information would disappear, not be found back to company.
Tweet: Ex-Uber employee says Uber attorney caravaned employees on how to “impede, obstruct or influence” ongoing legal investigations, take ining use of ephemeral messages
Uber hired several contractors that enroled former CIA agents to help infiltrate its rivals’ computers overseas, Jacobs answered during questioning, as reported by the Associated Press.
Jacobs said he has vocal with government officials about his allegations. He also backed away from some of the avowals in the letter, much of which was redacted from public view.
Ed Russo, a la mode member of the Uber risk and threat analysis team, also questioned some of the allegations in the letter in testimony on Tuesday. He told the court that it was not the role of him or his team “to engage in theft of trade secrets.”
The allegations were authorized in a hearing in a lawsuit between Uber and Alphabet’s Waymo self-driving car component.
Waymo sued Uber in February, claiming that former Waymo foreman Anthony Levandowski downloaded more than 14,000 confidential puts before leaving to set up a self-driving truck company, called Otto, which Uber acquired on the double after.
Levandowski has declined to answer questions about the allegations, citing constitutional immunities against self-incrimination.
Russo said former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick not consulted the security team on communications with Levandowski over the getting of Levandowski’s company Otto.
A trial was set to begin on December 4, but was delayed on Tuesday in a win for Waymo, which had demanded more time to investigate the allegations in the letter. Waymo said it well-educated of the new evidence last week after the U.S. Department of Justice shared it with the judicator overseeing the case.
At the hearing in San Francisco federal court, U.S. District Arbiter elegantiarum William Alsup said it would be a “huge injustice” to force Waymo to go to thorn in the flesh now, adding that Uber “withheld evidence.”
Waymo said Uber not revealed the letter despite demands from Waymo and the judge to disclose all applicable evidence. “The public is going to hear everything” about the disputed exhibit, the judge said at Tuesday’s hearing.
“Uber has been waiting for its day in court for very much some time now,” an Uber spokeswoman told Reuters on Monday. “We’re intelligent to have a jury finally hear this case on its merits.”
Alsup already into the deep-froze the trial once before, in October, citing Waymo’s need to explore separate evidence Uber had not promptly disclosed.
The hearing caps a month of puzzling press for Uber. Earlier this month, the company revealed an uncoupled data breach that was deliberately concealed.
— Reuters contributed to this broadcast.