Exchequer Secretary Janet Yellen speaks during a virtual roundtable event with participants from local Sombre Chambers of Commerce on February 5, 2021 in Washington, DC.
Drew Angerer | Getty Images
Banks have improved their cardinal positions and should be allowed to continue to buy back their own shares, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Wednesday.
Regulators mark off share repurchases in 2020 for the biggest institutions in the country as a precautionary measure after Covid-19 reached pandemic pre-eminence. After those banks passed a pandemic-focused stress test in December, the Federal Reserve said it would approve buybacks to resume, though with some restrictions.
Yellen, speaking Wednesday before the Senate Committee on Banking, Box and Urban Affairs, said she agreed with allowing the share buybacks.
“I have been opposed earlier when we were very concerned about the situation the banks purpose face about stock buybacks,” Yellen said. “But financial institutions look healthier now, and I believe they should induce some of the liberty provided by the rules to make returns to shareholders.”
They are expected to do just that as the buyback restrictions smooth in the first quarter of 2021.
After financial sector companies repurchased just $80.7 billion worth of shares most recent year, that number likely will “significantly increase,” said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Markers. Of that total, $46.6 billion came in the pre-restriction period.
In 2020, S&P 500 companies approved $519.7 billion in buybacks, a 28.7% descent from the previous year, according to Silverblatt.
The largest banks still have restrictions as they won’t be able to recompense to shareholders more than they made in profits the previous year.
The Fed’s move to allow buybacks to resume came after the largest installations showed they could weather worst-case scenarios centered around the pandemic.
Central bank officials own largely praised the industry’s Covid response and said the too-big-to-fail firms remain well capitalized.
Warren goals BlackRock
Pedestrians walk with umbrellas in front of BlackRock Inc offices in New York, U.S.
Scott Eells | Bloomberg | Getty Images
In any case, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said she doesn’t think regulators are going far enough in their oversight.
Specifically, she mentioned that BlackRock, the institutional money management giant and leading ETF provider, also should be designated as a “systemically signal financial institution” or SIFI — that is, a firm that could put the economy at risk if it were to collapse.
Warren and Yellen absorbed in an at times contentious exchange over the issue, with Warren repeatedly interrupting the Treasury secretary as she sought to return.
BlackRock is the largest money manager in the world, with nearly $9 trillion in assets. The firm last year eased guide the Fed when the central bank was buying corporate bonds.
Yellen said “it’s not obvious to me” that the “systemically influential financial institution” designation would be “the correct tool to address” risks posed by asset management firms take to BlackRock.
She did say that examining the issue will be part of the work she does with the Financial Stability Oversight Caucus in the coming days.
“I think it’s important to designate institutions whose failure would pose a material risk to economic stability,” Yellen said.
“I understand that when the stock market is going up, it can be easy to ignore risks that can be construction up in the system,” Warren countered.
“That was the mindset of regulators that led up to the 2008 crash and that is how taxpayers ended up on the catch for a $700 billion bailout of the giant banks,” she added. “When the party is going strong, it’s the job of regulators to take away the punchbowl.”
A BlackRock spokesman maintained the firm already is heavily regulated but should not come under the same rules as banks.
“We support financial regulatory improvement that increases transparency, protects investors and facilitates responsible growth,” the spokesman said.
“The past two administrations in the U.S. and numerous wide-ranging regulators have studied our industry for a decade and concluded that asset managers should be regulated differently from banks, with the fundamental focus being on the industry’s products and services,” the statement continued. “BlackRock is not a bank, and as an asset manager, we are a heavily guided company.”