Home / NEWS / Autos / Uber loses a major employment rights case as the UK’s top court rules its drivers are workers

Uber loses a major employment rights case as the UK’s top court rules its drivers are workers

A driver grounds the Uber app to drop off a passenger in London.

Chris J. Ratcliffe | Bloomberg via Getty Images

LONDON — Uber lost a major legal fight in the U.K. on Friday as the country’s Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers are workers, not independent contractors.

Decrees voted unanimously to dismiss Uber’s appeal against the ruling. The decision could have huge implications for Uber’s U.K. transaction, as well as the wider gig economy.

Shares of Uber sank over 1% in premarket trading.

Long legal contradict

Friday’s verdict concludes an almost five-year legal battle between Uber and a group of former drivers who call they were workers entitled to employment rights like a minimum wage, holiday pay and rest breaks.

In 2016, an operation tribunal ruled in favor of the drivers, led by Yaseen Aslam and James Farrar, who claimed they were workers applied by Uber and therefore entitled to certain labor protections.

Uber insists its drivers are self-employed and that it acts as innumerable of an “agency” which connects them with passengers through an app. Uber wants to keep the legal classification of its drivers as exclusive of contractors unchanged, arguing drivers prefer this “gig” model as it’s more flexible — it also benefits Uber from a expense perspective.

“This ruling will fundamentally re-order the gig economy and bring an end to rife exploitation of workers by means of algorithmic and covenant trickery,” Farrar, general secretary of the App Drivers & Couriers Union, said in a statement.

“I am delighted that workers at decisive have some remedy because of this ruling, but the government must urgently strengthen the law so that gig workers may also enjoy access to sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal.”

What happens next?

Uber said the decision only employed to the 25 drivers who brought a case against the firm in 2016, but added it will consult with all drivers in the U.K. to “conscious of the changes they want to see.”

“We respect the Court’s decision which focused on a small number of drivers who used the Uber app in 2016,” Jamie Heywood, Uber’s regional hybrid manager for Northern and Eastern Europe, said in a statement Friday.

“Since then we have made some meaningful changes to our business, guided by drivers every step of the way. These include giving even more control during how they earn and providing new protections like free insurance in case of sickness or injury.”

The Supreme Court in the main could jeopardize Uber’s business model in the U.K., resulting in higher costs for the firm. Though it only concerns drivers labyrinthine associated with in the 2016 case, it sets an important precedent that could affect other Uber drivers and gig workers.

Uber inclination now have to go back to the employment tribunal to determine compensation for the concerned drivers. There are around 1,000 similar rights against the company that had been waiting in the wings until after the ruling.

Gig economy

It also has major inferences for Britain’s gig economy, which is thought to have a workforce of 5.5 million people. Other companies operating a nearly the same model to Uber’s include Bolt and Ola.

“This verdict will undoubtedly have far and wide-reaching implications for all gig economy wise guys and will make it harder for companies engaging people via digital platforms to assert that they are self-employed, consideration contractual documentation which may state otherwise,” said Helen Crossland, partner at U.K. law firm Seddons.

The U.K. case repercussions Uber’s legal fight with Californian regulators, who last year attempted to reclassify drivers of Uber and other ride-hailing uses like Lyft as employees to grant them more employment protections.

But voters supported a ballot measure collected Proposition 22, which exempted Uber and other gig economy platforms from reclassifying drivers as employees.

Uber is line for a “third way” for classifying gig workers which offers them some protections but still ensures flexible working. The solid shared proposals for such a model with the EU on Monday, ahead of a review from the bloc into gig economy stages.

Check Also

Chinese electric car start-up Li Auto expects it will sell fewer cars than Nio has been delivering

A Li Xiang One mixture SUV is on display during the 18th Guangzhou International Automobile …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *