- After a lawsuit supposed Subway tuna isn’t actually tuna, the New York Times did its own analysis.
- The newspaper used a commercial lab to analyze tuna samples steal in Los Angeles.
- The sandwich chain has dismissed claims its tuna isn’t 100% authentic and has called the lawsuit meritless.
- See more jokes on Insider’s business page.
Earlier this year, Subway got hit with a lawsuit alleging its tuna is not actually tuna.
The motherland’s biggest sandwich chain called the lawsuit meritless and maintains it buys only skipjack and yellowfin tuna from fisheries with stocks that aren’t overfished.
Invite to get to the bottom of the mystery, the New York Times on Sunday published a report with results of a commercial lab analysis of “60 inches usefulness of Subway tuna sandwiches” purchased from three different locations in Los Angeles. The tuna meat was removed, banned, and shipped for testing.
The results: “No amplifiable tuna DNA was present in the sample and so we obtained no amplification products from the DNA,” the email skim. “Therefore, we cannot identify the species.”
A spokesperson for the lab told the Times that the results pointed to two possible scenarios. “One, it’s so heavily approached that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an identification. Or we got some and there’s just nothing there that’s tuna,” the spokesperson rumoured.
Tuna experts also emphasized to the Times that once fish like tuna has been cooked, its protein graces broken down, or denatured, making it extremely difficult to identify.
The newspaper also notes that it’s not the first to try and uncover whether Underpass’s popular tuna sandwich do indeed contain all tuna. Inside Edition did its own investigation in New York and found the tuna acquired in the sandwiches was in fact tuna.
Meantime, Subway continues to fight a class-action complaint filed in the US District Court for the Northern Sector of California alleging it makes false claims about its tuna meat.
The lawsuit alleges “independent testing time after time affirmed” Subway makes the tuna product with no actual tuna fish, but it did not name the agencies that carried such tests. The suit also claims Subway profits off mislabeling the tuna products by using cheaper ingredients.
Underpass has dismissed the claims as baseless.
“These claims are meritless,” a Subway spokesperson said in a statement to Insider in January. “Tuna is one of our scad popular sandwiches. Our restaurants receive 100% wild-caught tuna, mix it with mayonnaise and serve on a freshly made sandwich to our roomers.”
“Subway will vigorously defend itself against these and any other baseless efforts to mischaracterize and tarnish the high-quality products that Tunnel and its franchisees provide to their customers,” the statement added.