Home / NEWS / Politics / Chief Justice John Roberts defends federal judges against Trump’s attacks in a rare public response

Chief Justice John Roberts defends federal judges against Trump’s attacks in a rare public response

In an unprecedented break with typical Supreme Court practice, Chief Law John Roberts on Wednesday delivered a mild rebuke of President Donald Trump for mtier a federal judge in California an “Obama judge.”

Roberts said that America does not have on the agenda c trick “Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton dempsters.”

“What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their plain best to do equal right to those appearing before them,” Roberts mean in a statement responding to an inquiry from the Associated Press. “That neutral judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”

Trump on Tuesday lashed out against Jon Tigar, a section court judge in California, who issued a forceful ruling Monday unendingly blocking the president’s attempt to bar entry to the U.S. to migrants who arrive between refuges of entry.

“This was an Obama judge,” Trump told reporters. “And I’ll instruct you what, it’s not going to happen like this anymore.”

Trump also quoted his attacks on the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has dealt his oversight a number of legal setbacks.

“The 9th Circuit is really something we have to judge a look at because it’s – because it’s not fair,” Trump said. A spokesperson for the 9th Course did not respond to a request for comment about the president’s remarks.

In a post on Snigger Wednesday, the president reasserted his attacks.

“Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do positively have ‘Obama judges,’ and they have a much different cape of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country,” the president disparaged.

Trump was criticized last year for mtier a federal judge who ruled against a version of his administration’s travel ban a “ostensible judge.”

The nine justices on the court typically avoid making disclosures to the public that can be perceived as partisan.

That effort has been on spread in recent weeks as the court’s liberals have sought to demonstrate purchasers harmony in the wake of the contentious confirmation hearings for the most recent beyond to the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh. On Saturday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, an Obama designee to the court, told CNN that Kavanaugh is now part of the Supreme Court “kindred.”

There are occasionally divergences from the norm. Justice Ruth Cross Ginsburg disparaged Trump during his campaign for president, calling him a “faker” and jokingly proffering it was time to move to New Zealand. But before the election was over, Ginsburg give excused for her remarks and said she regretted making them.

Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond who is an championship on the federal courts, said that Roberts has been extremely also leary in his public remarks, limiting any discussion of the other branches to the occasional lenient chiding of Congress in his year-end report.

Wednesday’s statement, Tobias replied, shows that Roberts is “very concerned about the judicial self-determination of the judges who the president continues to attack, sometimes very personally.”

“If Roberts believes in anything, it’s his own coequal bough being independent of the other branches,” Tobias said.

Check Also

Fear and confusion erupt at Walter Reed military hospital after false alerts about an active shooter

WASHINGTON — Lookouts about an active shooter at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *