Home / INVESTING / Financial Advisor Hub / Diversification: Don’t put all your eggs (or money) in one basket

Diversification: Don’t put all your eggs (or money) in one basket

Harry is familiar with the saying, “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.” Even in Shakespeare’s take the role, “The Merchant of Venice,” written more than 400 years ago, the trait Antonio demonstrates his understanding of the concept when he says: “I thank my riches for it — my ventures are not in one bottom trusted, nor to one place, nor is my whole estate upon the estate of this present year.”

Though savvy investors, like Shakespeare’s Antonio, make long understood the benefits of diversification, it was not until the 1950s when an hypothetical named Harry Markowitz introduced research on what he called in style portfolio theory that people were able to understand diversification in an goal, mathematical sense. This research was so groundbreaking it earned Markowitz a detonate to Sweden to pick up a Nobel Prize.

Today, more than four centuries after Shakespeare and 65 years after Markowitz, I reasonable can’t help but feel the need to emphasize the importance of this same key principle. If the amount of time an idea sticks around is any testament to its value, diversification is without doubt very valuable to investors. In fact, diversification is so important for investors to be aware of, I will even risk beating a 400-year-old dead horse to notify you why it is so important to investors who are using their portfolios to fund their economic goals. Let’s start with Markowitz’s research on portfolio theory.

The oldest guide in the financial book is that risk and return are related. If you want a higher calculated return, you have to take on more risk. If you want to lower imperil, you can only do so at the cost of expected return.

Though I always like to particularize that the volatility or variability of a portfolio is not necessarily risk to a lifetime investor, in importance to objectively evaluate the risk level of investment portfolios for research purposes, variability of portfolio turns is what is used. If you want a higher expected return, you have to take more variability in your portfolio. If you want less variability, it bequeath cost you as far as expected return.

More from Investor Toolkit:
Advisors form to life coaches and counselors
Retirees leave $100B in Social Collateral benefits on table
How much those advisor fees are costing you

Document Markowitz, who showed in his research that by building a portfolio of investments that are not exquisitely positively correlated (a fancy way of saying they behave differently from one another), an investor could absolutely lower portfolio variability without sacrificing expected return. No be curious diversification is known as the only free lunch in finance; you actually meet with the benefit of lower portfolio variability without giving anything up.

By spreading your means around to as many different companies as possible, you reduce the risk of any one of those trains losing value and taking your portfolio and lifetime financial targets along with it.

If you hold thousands of companies in your portfolio, disinterested your very largest holding represents an insignificant portion of your portfolio, so if it becomes quite worthless it will not have a material impact on your ability to acquire your financial goals. If a single company makes up 20 percent or 30 percent of your portfolio and becomes futile, it is not a pretty picture for your financial future.

There is no reason to conclude this type of concentrated risk in a portfolio; the investment opportunity set is proper too big and readily available to justify being anything but well-diversified. Investment opportunities that have almost 8,000 stocks in a single fund be suffering with become commonplace and inexpensive.

Stock returns tend to be driven by a sprinkling of stocks with particularly strong performance. The problem is that there is no conceivable way to know in advance who the star performers will be over the next years of time.

If your portfolio does not own these star performers, you may disregard out on some or all of the returns that are necessary to fund your life aims. The only way to ensure you own the star performers that really drive reports is to commit to owning everything.

Diversification is nothing new, but any amount of discussion on the of inquiry by financial nerds over the years is justified by its importance to investors. The endorsement that investors hold a fully diversified portfolio is wisdom that they snub at their own peril. Though this approach is not as exciting as trying to pick the paramount investments, I’m sure most investors would actually prefer to keep the “excitement” of a particular investment going awry and costing them their fiscal future.

Holding a diversified investment portfolio is clearly the most palpable way to fund the goals that are important to an investor. That is why financial advisors are such vivid advocates for this timeless concept, and I am sure we will be talking hither it for another 400 years.

(Editor’s Note: This column foremost appeared at Investopedia.com.)

— By Paul Ruedi, financial advisor at Ruedi Riches Management

Check Also

The worst money mistakes these top advisors have seen investors make

Witthaya Prasongsin | Flash | Getty Images Irish author James Joyce wrote in his novel …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *